Hi Cats,
Yes, I can see your point. I will probably have to admit to some extent this is true.
I would argue the problem can be explained in terms of philosophical history. I am not offering history as an excuse here. Also, other people may have a different theory to the one I am going to put forward.
The idea of the infinite becoming finite goes back to the Ancient Greeks, notably Plato and Aristotle. There is not enough room to go into details about such things as Plato's theory of forms. Basically, the idea of a perfect and infinite entity becoming finite is not a strange idea in Western thinking. In order to explain how the infinite could become finite Plato put forward the idea of a mediating entity which acted as a type of interpreter between this world and the perfect world.
Early Christian philosophers borrowed these ideas from Plato and Aristotle. Therefore, we could argue that this type of thinking has a strong and unbroken philosophical tradition.
On this basis it would not be hard to claim some type of exclusivity. This is true from my point of view because I accept some of this philosophical tradition as true and I can see places in the bible which support these ideas.
However, I am very much aware of the problem of dogma. This type of thinking where you are unwilling to listen to any alternative ideas results in a degree of arrogance. From my experience at these religious sites we see people painting themselves into a corner because they are prepared to take their ideas to a logical conclusion.
Just my thoughts
Regards
Tut