Ask Me Help Desk - Secular Humanism

Quote:

Originally Posted by sassyT

You can ask till you are blue in the face and I won't tell you because unlike you... I do not share my personal life with strangers online. How do I know you are not going to buy a plain ticket to come and stark me at my school. You have already shown that you have a lot time on your hands so I don't trust what idle people can do with information. :rolleyes:

https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/adult-...-a-178171.html

Quote:

I am a 26 year old model, considered very attractive, and have been married since June last year. My husband and I have been together for 5 years now and he is a good husband. He is very loving and caring and I have little to complain about in general except lately he has not had a strong sex drive as he normally does. He is not as aggressive as he used to be in bed. He some times does not get an errection from making out with me when I am naked and this never used to be the case. When we have sex he is good after one round where as before he used to like to go for 2-3 rounds. When we do go to 2 rounds it takes him ages to climax, if ever. I have been reading other people's posts on this issue and it seem like this is not unusuall, or is it? This has been this way for about a month now and I am to worry because it makes me feel very unsexy.

And I assume you are black because you are curious about skin lightening.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sassyT

I think everyone here knows BBC to be a credible source for News on new scientific research and the encylopedia is too. Again like i said before, i think your zeal for you beliefs is good, but the problems is, it blinds you from reality.

BBC is indeed a news source. But neither the BBC nor any encyclopedia are centers of scientific research, nor are BBC news articles ever regarded as scientific research papers.

You obviously never have heard about the system of peer reviews... You are so ignorant...
And that for someone claiming to have a degree in Biology...

Quote:

Originally Posted by sassyT

How do i know you are not going to buy a plain ticket to come and stalk me at my school. You have already shown that you have alot time on your hands so i dont trust what idle people can do with information.

You can´t be real on that... I buying a ticket from Europe to you? Why would I do that? I could be your grandfather in age... However : note I stated `in age´, because all my grandchildren are nice and intelligent instead...

··:D ····:D ····:D ····:D ····:D ····

·

[QUOTE]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Credendovidis

BBC is indeed a news source. But neither the BBC nor any encyclopedia are centers of scientific research, nor are BBC news articles ever regarded as scientific research papers.

You obviously never have heard about the system of peer reviews... You are so ignorant...
And that for someone claiming to have a degree in Biology...

**sigh*** Credo BBC was reporting on the New Scientific descoveries that scientists reasearched and wrote research papers on. No one said BBC did the research... **sigh** Why are simple concepts so hard for you to grasp. :rolleyes:

Quote:

You can´t be real on that... I buying a ticket from Europe to you? Why would I do that? I could be your grandfather in age... However : note I stated `in age´, because all my grandchildren are nice and intelligent instead...

Hey, you never know what pschos are online. Some people call me sassy at school so I wouldn't want strangers online to know what school I attend lest they find me and kill me or something.. lol, considering I am discussing controversial topics that I am highly opinionated on.

Hello again, sassy:

We are sentient beings. I'll bet that's a term you've never heard of. It means that we can contemplate our own existence. That makes us smarter than all the other species.

During our contemplative times, we observed that we die. Then some people made up a story, so they can deny it. I guess death scares 'em.

Dogs don't know they're going to die. At least they can't be blamed for their lack of knowledge. You, however, can be.

excon

Why is that Ex? "I think therefore I am."

Why among all creatures are we the only ones, that we know of, that can philosophize, worship whatever, ponder the origins of the universe?

What genes lead to this? What is the selective advantage of this ability?

Quote:

Originally Posted by inthebox

Why is that Ex? "I think therefore I am."

Why among all creatures are we the only ones, that we know of, that can philosophize, worship whatever, ponder the origins of the universe?

What genes lead to this? What is the selective advantage of this ability?

Lol good question
I am also curious to know why, out of ALL the millions of species that have ever existed, why only ONE of those millions (humans) are the ONLY species that evolved and developed such specialised qualities.

Hello again:

Why, you ask? I don't know why. All I know is what's so.

excon

Quote:

Originally Posted by inthebox

Why among all creatures are we the only ones, that we know of, that can philosophize, worship whatever, ponder the origins of the universe? What genes lead to this? What is the selective advantage of this ability?

We mammals were lucky that an asteroid hit earth approx. 65 Millions years ago, causing extinction of almost all dinosaurs, making the way of life free for mammals to grab that opportunity to grow and diversify.

We humanoids were lucky that nature allowed us to evolve into vertical transportation, allowing our hands to become better tools to do work for us and to defend us. It also allowed our brains to grow and develop further.

We humans were lucky that evolution allowed all that, and made us the only species that can philosophize, worship whatever, and ponder the origins of the universe.

:rolleyes:

·

Quote:

Originally Posted by sassyT

i am also curious to know why, out of ALL the millions of species that have ever existed, why only ONE of those millions (humans) are the ONLY species that evolved and developed such specialised (specialized) qualities.

Because all those who lacked that capacity were bypassed by evolution and became extinct for whatever reason it was. Nature looks for a slightly changed life form that fits the conditions of that moment. It either finds one and continues the experiment, or that species gets extinct. It is as simple as that !

:rolleyes:

So you Cred have come out of the closet as a Darwinist!

[QUOTE]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Credendovidis

We mammals were lucky that an asteroid hit earth approx. 65 Millions years ago, causing extinction of almost all dinosaurs, making the way of life free for mammals to grab that opportunity to grow and diversify.

This is Your BELIEF unless if you can prove that you were there 65 million years ago to witness this.

Quote:

We humanoids were lucky that nature allowed us to evolve into vertical transportation, allowing our hands to become better tools to do work for us and to defend us. It also allowed our brains to grow and develop further

So why out of millions of species, is the humaniod the ONLY one that develop specailized features? Lets here what you believe on that matter.

Quote:

We humans were lucky that evolution allowed all that, and made us the only species that can philosophize, worship whatever, and ponder the origins of the universe.

So credo attributes our existence to a big bang that just came from no where and created a little warm soup where this little mythical one cell creature crawled out and morphed into flowers, insects, fish, pigs, lions etc and with a touch of "luck" humans apeared.
Nice.

Quote:

Originally Posted by inthebox

So you Cred have come out of the closet as a Darwinist!

Lol.. he is finally out of the closet. Its about time. :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by sassyT

...this is Your BELIEF unless if you can prove that you were there 65 million years ago to witness this ...

Stated by someone who suggests that the universe can be some 5000 trillion years old...

Yeah, sure...

:D

·

Quote:

Originally Posted by Credendovidis

Stated by someone who suggests that the universe can be some 5000 trillion years old ...

Yeah, sure ...

:D

·

At least I am rational enough to admit my 5000 trillion year date is based on guess work.. which is just as good as your 14.5 billion guess. :rolleyes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by sassyT

Atleast i am rational enough to admit my 5000 trillion year date is based on guess work.

5000 Trillion years is based on "Guess work" ??? And you claim to have a degree in biology ?

:D :D :D :D :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by Credendovidis

5000 Trillion years is based on "Guess work" ??? And you claim to have a degree in biology ?

Yes I did claim to have a degree in biology, however I never claimed to have a degree guess work... lol
"the universe is 14.3 billion years old " FYI this Guess work. :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by sassyT

Yes i did claim to have a degree in biology

If you would attend more to your studies in biology to get a real degree, and learned to understand what the essence is of scientific research, you would not post these preposterous statements...

:rolleyes:

·

Hello again:

You just can't argue with people who think an entire body of study is pretend. I can't imagine a life like that. Wouldn't you be afraid of falling off the edge of the earth? Why would you ever see a doctor, or get vaccinated? Why would you get into an airplane? I don't know. It's really weird to me.

excon

Quote:

Originally Posted by excon

You just can't argue with people who think an entire body of study is pretend.

Indeed Excon ! But about what to do... Getting into a cell , isolated from the entire world, and having the key thrown away, is neither a positive alternative, isn't it?
Specially if that cell is located in New Orleans below water level... I really would worry there... And demand a glas-covered key box in my cell with escape key - just in case...

:D

·

Quote:

Originally Posted by Credendovidis

If you would attend more to your studies in biology to get a real degree, and learned to understand what the essence is of scientific research, you would not post these preposterous statements ....

·

I know enough science to know that some fields of science i.e geochronology, rely on unverifiable ASSUMPTIONS as a premise therefore the out come of the finding can not be factual.
You obviously won't know anything about this because the last time you ever attended a science class was probably in the Renaissance period or something lol, this field of science did not exists in your day. :rolleyes: