Quote:
even napaleon went across the red sea at the place where it parts or tried to, you must be ignorant of history to not know he proved it exists and where. You see only when the wind blows directly from the east there does the water part. But if the winds shifts, it closes. Napaleon on his horse almost drown trying to get out before the water went back in.
Everyone knows the Red Sea exists, but as you so nicely pointed out it was not an act of God that parted the Red Sea as told in the Exodus story, but an act of nature. This does not in any way prove the story true, it just proves back when the story was written they too knew of the act of nature.
Quote:
you don't know the history of egypt.
Yes I do, and no where in their history do they mention the story of moses, and the great escape.
Quote:
joseph of the coat of many colors was known as imhotep. He ruled the country (under the pharoah-who was a relative as the bible states).
This is just fantasy, there is not much to support it because the times these guys lived were not even close to being the same. Imhotep lived during the third dynasty(2635-2595 BCE) while most theologians say Joseph lived around 1730 BCE. Looks to me like someone borrowed an egyptian story and tried to apply it to themselves. That's just my theory though. I would like to mention though that Imhotep was deified and became the son of Ptah. He was thought of as a God by the egyptians. I think this should be more than enough to show they are two different people. Joseph was never considered a God and rightly so because the Bible tells us there is only one, right?
Quote:
joseph many think wrote 'genesis',
I never heard this.
Quote:
you see moses was in egypt about 400 yeas later, and he was taught all the egyptians knew as a prince of eygpt, and choose to be counted as a hebrew. And when moses left eygpt he wrote down the 5 books (torah) from memory of genesis, and divine inspiration of all.
Yep and even wrote of his own death and funeral. That's some trick.
Quote:
we have even found the statue of one wearing a coat of many colors, in eygpt, in the place where the bible says they lived, for the hebrews did not live with the eygptians, but in their own settlement. And his tomb, but the bible says when moses and the others left they took his body back to the holy land, and imhoteps tomb is empty. Yes they had oblitered the face on the statue because they wanted to forget the hebrews were ever there. The eygptians often 'wiped out the pharoahs monuments' they did not like after the pharoahs died, but never well enough.
I don't even know what to say about this. I don't know if I should laugh or cry. It's amazing to me the lengths people will go to just to prove the Bible true. I think you will have to try harder than this. So far you have shown the Hebrews liked to borrow things from earlier legends for their own. This is not the only case of this either. As I have mentioned before a lot of those early stories in the Bible came from earlier stories and legends. History does not prove the Bible factual, and in most cases proves the exact opposite. Sure there is all kinds of proof of all the enemies the hebrews faced but for some reason we come up blank on the heroes. Explain that to me. That's like saying Captain America was a real person because Hitler was a real person.
