1. You still have the problem of where God came from. Also, God is violating the first law of thermodynamics because he is creating something out of nothing. Somethign that creates somethign out of nothing, even if they are all powerful, is breaking this law.
2. A materialistic view has absolutely no problem with accepting that there was equal energy now as there was at the big bang. Why does there need to be a "first sauce"? Couldn't it have always been? The God argument rests on the same fact that God could have always been.
The tornado itself is proof that increasing entropy can seem to be violated if one doesnt look at the whole system. A tornado is formed by unpredictable and random winds, but somehow these form a stable structure.
BTW, It's voila, not "wala", unless you're saying that
Wala did it.