The reason for that is that both the static and the oscillating thesi (note : NOT theories *) have been dumped in view of the latest OSE. They are replaced by the expanding universe thesis, as the latest findings indicate that the speed of expansion is no longer decreasing but actually increasing. (As if there is a sort of anti-gravity force present, overtaking the effect of the decreasing gravitational force - due to the actual expansion).Quote:
Originally Posted by JimGunther
Note : the thesis of dark matter and dark energy seems to explain the expansion, but there is still no OSE for the existence of either.
That first part you may believe, of course.Quote:
Originally Posted by JimGunther
On the second part you are spot-on. The suggestion made here too often by creationists as if rejection of one possibility has to result in accepting the other possibility is preposterous, and shows the creationist's lack of scientific understanding. Apparently they can not accept that we simply do not know the correct answer yet.
Good points !
:)
* In science : a thesis is a scientific proposal. And a theory is a thesis that is confirmed by OSE (Objective Supported Evidence). Some theories are confirmed with so much OSE that they are called Theory (with a capital T). They represent near-facts - though still open (as anything in science) to scrutiny and review.
The correction to Newton's Theory of gravity due to Einstein's Theory of relativity is an example of that.
:)