Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Religious Discussions (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=485)
-   -   "Happy Holidays"? (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=154276)

  • Nov 28, 2007, 09:27 AM
    jillianleab
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by De Maria
    Are you faulting us because we exercise our rights? Last I looked we have a right to gather peacefully, we have a right of free speech and we have a right to practice our faith.

    Did you object when feminists burned their bras to demand the freedom to kill infants it their womb?

    Do you also object when gays parade up and down the streets demanding the freedom to have their cohabitation recognized as marriage?

    Or do you simply object to Christians exercising their rights?

    Sincerely,

    De Maria

    Not at all, I have no desire to take away anyone's freedoms. Christians have the right to protest, to boycott stores, etc just as much as anyone else. I was responding to Moon's statement regarding Christians protesting more than others was not factual, hence the fact her statement was quoted directly above mine.

    For the record though, I think it's petty and childish to rip pages out of medical books, to steal books you don't like the content of and to destroy food you have not purchased as a form of protest. I believe, if those individuals were actually caught for their actions they could be charged for destruction of property or for theft. That's not the Christian way, is it? :)
  • Nov 28, 2007, 09:35 AM
    margog85
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by De Maria
    Are you faulting us because we exercise our rights? Last I looked we have a right to gather peacefully, we have a right of free speech and we have a right to practice our faith.

    Did you object when feminists burned their bras to demand the freedom to kill infants it their womb?

    Do you also object when gays parade up and down the streets demanding the freedom to have their cohabitation recognized as marriage?

    Or do you simply object to Christians exercising their rights?

    Sincerely,

    De Maria

    No one is faulting you for exercising your rights. Just pointing out that the objection to 'Happy Holidays' is a far louder protest than those who are against 'Merry Christmas'. You have the right to protest whatever you want- just don't expect things to go your way when you're insisitng that your religion and only your religion be recognized at this time of year. It's not going to happen- you can say Merry Christmas all you want and no one will persecute you for it- but when a store associate wishes you well generically rather than making assumptions in regard to your beliefs and what you're celebrating, finding fault in them for that is wrong.

    The examples you give are poor. The feminist and gay rights movements are efforts to acquire basic human rights for those who currently do not have them. This debate is insignificant in comparison. As Jillianleab said, the real outrage should be at the commercialism during your sacred holiday season, not what the store associate utters mindlessly 500 times a day as you pay for a cart load of unnecessary material items.

    No one is trying to prevent Christians from exercising their rights- so please don't try to victimize Christians. In society and government today, it is really more along the lines of Christians trying to prevent those who are of alternate beliefs from exercising their rights- for example, since you brought it up, preventing gays from marrying because according to Christian morality homosexuality is a sin, and apparently Christian morality is the dictator of Federal law- but that's off topic, so let's not go there.
  • Nov 28, 2007, 09:47 AM
    margog85
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by De Maria
    The fact is, it is Christians who respect others religions. Christianity respects and teaches freedom of conscience. That is why the founding Fathers created a nation where one may practice freedom of religion. Try practicing your faith in a Muslim nation or in an atheist state like China.

    Really? Freedom of conscience? Perhaps doctrinally that is part of Christianity and Catholicism, but in practice?

    You give examples of oppressive belief systems in other countries but that exists here too, just in different ways. 'Try practicing your faith in a Muslim nation?'

    How about... try getting married in America if you gay? Ooops, can't, Christians who respect freedom of conscience are against that one!

    And I did not make up things and attribute them to you- I posed a number of questions, things which could be deduced from things you said- and re-reading my post, they may not have been solely from your argument, but partially from yours and partially from those of others who have posted on this thread. I do apologize if it appeared to be accusations toward you only- the majority of my post was in response to yours, but it is possible that due to the number of people posting and the length of this thread, some things may have unintentionally been pulled in from the arguments of others.

    So I do apologize there if it came off that way.
  • Nov 28, 2007, 09:59 AM
    jillianleab
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by inthebox
    In an effort to not offend anyone and be "diverse" no one's uniqueness is recognized.

    We are all commanded to be bland inoffensive people in the name of politically correct ideology/ religion that is forcing its belief on those that care about what matters most to us Christians - faith in Jesus Christ.

    There is no "freedom FROM religion" in the constitution but a freedom of religious expression.

    As to a "persecution complex" check this out

    Gillian Gibbons at risk of more serious charges after letting her class of 7-year-olds name a teddy bear Muhammad

    Though I think you are going a little overboard with your language ("commanded", "bland") I agree with you. The PC movement is a little nuts and there are far to many people from any and all sides which overreact.

    But I have to ask, how is a minimum wage seasonal employee wishing you "Happy Holidays" taking away part of your faith? Is faith not a personal thing? Even if, say, the government said NO expressions of religion may be had, would that compromise your faith? Would you believe a little less if you were not allowed to wear a cross around your neck? I don't know you personally, but based on the responses I've seen you give in this site, I would say no, that's not going to shake your faith.

    You're also right there is no freedom FROM religion, but employees of a store saying "Happy Holidays" is hardly restricting freedom of religious expression. Besides, even if the employees are ordered by the organization to say "Happy Holidays", as long as it's a private organization, they can do that. There is no prohibition of celebrating Christmas on your own time, just how the store wants people to be greeted. It's the same as when a store requires staff to say "Welcome to McDonald's how may I help you today?" If you don't like it, you are free to quit.

    And sorry, but your "persecution complex" story doesn't apply - that situation is taking place in a foreign land which has no religious freedom. Horrible story, stupid charges, but it does not demonstrate how Christians specifically are being persecuted, especially in the US.
  • Nov 28, 2007, 11:12 AM
    De Maria
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jillianleab
    Not at all, I have no desire to take away anyone's freedoms. Christians have the right to protest, to boycott stores, etc just as much as anyone else.

    Good. That is all I wanted you to say.

    Quote:

    For the record though, I think it's petty and childish to rip pages out of medical books, to steal books you don't like the content of and to destroy food you have not purchased as a form of protest. I believe, if those individuals were actually caught for their actions they could be charged for destruction of property or for theft. That's not the Christian way, is it? :)
    Agreed. But there's no proof those things ever happened. Just one person's allegations.

    But, are you insinuating that only Christians do childish things?

    Sincerely,

    De Maria
  • Nov 28, 2007, 11:25 AM
    De Maria
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by margog85
    Really? Freedom of conscience? Perhaps doctrinally that is part of Christianity and Catholicism, but in practice?

    Yes. In practice. This nation and many other nations born of Christian values are where you can exercise your freedom of conscience.

    Quote:

    You give examples of oppressive belief systems in other countries but that exists here too, just in different ways. 'Try practicing your faith in a Muslim nation?'
    Not happy here are you? Funny how folks that are unhappy in the US won't leave.

    Quote:

    How about... try getting married in America if you gay? Ooops, can't, Christians who respect freedom of conscience are against that one!
    All freedoms have a limit. The right to be married is limited by the sex of the individuals being married. That is what I believe.

    They certainly have the right to protest our beliefs however. Somehow I doubt that one will ever become law. And if it does, I believe it will be the first one overturned by 2/3 majority as is our right.

    Quote:

    And I did not make up things and attribute them to you- I posed a number of questions, things which could be deduced from things you said- and re-reading my post, they may not have been solely from your argument, but partially from yours and partially from those of others who have posted on this thread. I do apologize if it appeared to be accusations toward you only- the majority of my post was in response to yours, but it is possible that due to the number of people posting and the length of this thread, some things may have unintentionally been pulled in from the arguments of others.

    So I do apologize there if it came off that way.
    Apology accepted.

    Sincerely,

    De Maria
  • Nov 28, 2007, 11:31 AM
    De Maria
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by fallen2grace
    Okay, I wanted more opinions on this. My mom got this email and sent it to me:



    I would rather say Happy whatever for each holiday then just say "Happy Holidays"
    If people get so offended by saying "Merry Chirstmas" Dont they know that some people get offended if you say Happy Holidays? What do you guys think?

    I've enjoyed the reparte' folks. If you address me in any messages, be aware that "Ah'll be bock!...." in ten days.
  • Nov 28, 2007, 12:05 PM
    margog85
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by De Maria

    Not happy here are you? Funny how folks that are unhappy in the US won't leave.

    The 'if you don't like it, leave' mentality is not necessarily one I agree with. How about, if you don't like it, change it? If you don't like it, and other people don't like it, work to make it better?

    I am happy in America, but that doesn't mean it is perfect- no society ever will be, everyone will have qualms with something- which is why it is our duty to not just sit back and accept the things we dislike about our country and say 'well, it'll never be perfect, so why try?' but instead to do our part to make improvements. Leaving an imperfect country does nothing except appease those who are either too stupid to see the problems or too apathetic to care that problems exist.

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by de maria
    All freedoms have a limit. The right to be married is limited by the sex of the individuals being married. That is what I believe.

    And that is your belief, based upon Christian morality, which you feel should be imposed upon others who may not share your belief. I don't want to get into this topic here, it's completely unrelated. But evidently just another instance of the imposition of Christian morality upon secular culture.
  • Nov 28, 2007, 12:13 PM
    jillianleab
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by De Maria
    Good. That is all I wanted you to say.



    Agreed. But there's no proof those things ever happened. Just one person's allegations.

    But, are you insinuating that only Christians do childish things?

    Sincerely,

    De Maria

    De Maria I think you need to read my sig and my posts a little more carefully. You have twice, in two separate threads taken what I've said and looked at it in a way that I have a negative view or hatred of Christians, or that I wish to take other's rights away. Nothing in my post about protests indicated whatsoever that I felt Christians shouldn't have the same rights as others, so please stop trying to paint me as someone who applies freedoms unequally. I said very clearly in my first post of the things Christians specifically were doing, I never said they shouldn't do them, so for you to ask if I think Christians should not be allowed to protest and then say "That's what I wanted you to say" is ridiculous and pompous. Read more carefully and you will understand the messages instead of reading what you THINK I'm saying and trying to stir up trouble.

    You've done it again with "are you insinuating that only Christians do childish things?". Where in my post, in ANY post did I say or indicate that? And passing off the information I passed on about pages being torn from books as "one person's allegations" and there is no "proof" implies you think either 1. I'm a liar or 2. The staff at my county library is full of liars. But you apparently think everyone is "out to get the Christians" so of course this must be made up.

    Either way, I no longer wish to discuss things with you, as you are rude and try to provoke people. Consider yourself officially added to my "ignore" list.
  • Nov 28, 2007, 09:12 PM
    Wangdoodle
    Every Who down in Who-ville, the tall and the small,
    Was singing! Without any presents at all!
    He HADN'T stopped Christmas from coming!
    IT CAME!
    Somehow or other, it came just the same!

    And the Grinch, with his grinch-feet ice-cold in the snow,
    Stood puzzling and puzzling: "How could it be so?
    It came without ribbons! It came without tags!
    "It came without packages, boxes or bags!"
    And he puzzled three hours, `till his puzzler was sore.
    Then the Grinch thought of something he hadn't before!
    "Maybe Christmas," he thought, "doesn't come from a store.
    "Maybe Christmas...perhaps...means a little bit more!" -Dr Seuss
  • Nov 28, 2007, 09:27 PM
    llyndzy
    I say don't give a shizzz about what people think, who cares if they get offended, everything used to be normal, but now its all a buch a ********* <not good.

    Its tradition
    Screw them and go on ignore all the shiz they throw at us
    ILL FIGHT BACK... WILL YOU!
  • Nov 28, 2007, 09:46 PM
    labman
    It just struck me. Do we want a non Christian wishing us a Merry Christmas just to give them or their employer a better shot at our dollar? If somebody can't give me a Merry Christmas from their heart, do I want it?
  • Nov 28, 2007, 09:48 PM
    MoonlitWaves
    Quoted from Jillianleab
    "Really? Because it's Christians I see on the corner with signs protesting movies or policical actions. It's Christians who declared the "War on Christmas" when the STORES decided to say "Happy Holidays". I've never seen or heard of anyone causing a ruckus because a store says "Merry Christmas", but there has been a "War" declared for saying "Happy Holidays". I've also seen very little protesting from other religious groups about what is taught in schools, what books are in our libraries"

    Think about this for a minute. What you are seeing is the protest from Christians about stores not saying "Merry Christmas". But you forget to think about why it was changed to "Happy Holidays" in the first place. Why was it changed in the first place? It's more than likely a combination of things. One reason could be that the store owners do not wish to acknowledge just one belief. It could also be that those who are not Christian protest the saying of "Merry Christmas" since they do not celebrate Christmas. Whether it's for the better or no the point is Christians aren't the only ones protesting.

    I'm not sure if it was you but someone asked would I or do I refuse to shop at these stores the rest of the year. This could have been a general question to anyone who answers too so I will answer. I don't refuse to shop anywhere, anytime of the year. It's not a big deal for me to hear "Happy Holidays". I am also all for fairness, especially when it concerns those things which are important, such as religion. I have respect because I want respect. If you read the other thread in the Christianity topic you will see that I am a Christian who respects that prayer was taken out of school as a set time/group activity or however you phrase it. I have that respect because was it prayer in/for a different religion than mine I too would do the same protesting that was done to have prayer done away with as a set time. That's off the topic I know, but the point is I have respect for other people's right to their religion. What my argument was about, and I know I am repeating myself, is this... (1)No matter what you do you usually step on toes. For example; if you take away "Merry Christmas" you have stepped on Christians toes to please non-Christians. If you continue to say "Merry Christmas" you have stepped on non-Christian's toes. So how do you completely justify either one? You go with the lesser evil right? "Happy Holidays" basically respects all beliefs during this season. And I agree with that. I am defending the Christian thinking not only because I am a Christian but because whether you have made the better decision or not you can't fault someone for agreeing or disagreeing. Their beliefs make them think the way they do and they have a freedom to that. Let'em protest because they are standing up for what they believe in whether it's agreed upon or not, whether it's the best decision or not (I mean this as within the law). Think it ridiculous or absurd all you want, but they have just as much right as you have to disagree with them. See what I mean? (2) My argument was also this... Someone had said that Christians were making a big deal out of the greeting thing. My argument was that it seems to me that those who protest the saying of "Merry Christmas" is making the bigger deal as Christmas will still be all around them. How can hearing a Merry Christmas greeting bother them to this extent when until the Christmas season is over with they will see it everywhere they turn. It was simply a rebuttle against the statement that a big deal was being made from Christians and it may be, but we aren't the only ones.

    ".... Just a little story for you, my mom works for the county library system. When Christians find books they don't like in the library, they make a fuss about it and demand the book be removed. If it is not removed, they check the books out and never return them, or rip out the offending pages (like medical books depicting genitals). I also remember hearing about Christian groups going into grocery stores, filling their carts with frozen foods, and leaving them in the aisles to protest the sale of (I think) Harry Potter books in the grocery store. So maybe there's no "official statistic" about Christians and protest, but it certainly seems they are the group who is the most vocal."
    This, I agree, is way out of hand. Like I said earlier whether we think it ridiculous or not people have a right to protest and should be respected for standing up for what they believe in. I don't agree when they break laws like stealing books, destroying property, etc. I don't even agree with rudeness and cruelty in protesting even if it's within the law. I believe that Christians like everyone else should stand up for what they believe in, explain why they believe the way the do and why it, in their mind, would be the better thing, but as Christians we should not lose our focus on what Jesus would have done. He most definintely would have told you the better or right way but He would have done it nicely, in a civil fashion, with loving kindness and tenderness. Never would he have stolen a book. He knows we have free will and even when He was on this earth, Truth right in front of their faces, he kept with freewill. We know that because there were still some who denied Him. This is not to say He doesn't or didn't ever get angry, but angry or no He could have forced belief in His truth, but he didn't.

    "But I have to ask, how is a minimum wage seasonal employee wishing you "Happy Holidays" taking away part of your faith? Is faith not a personal thing? Even if, say, the government said NO expressions of religion may be had, would that compromise your faith? Would you believe a little less if you were not allowed to wear a cross around your neck? "
    I know you were addressing someone else with this but I would like to say something on it. The same questions could be asked to everyone else. Does hearing "Merry Christmas" lessen your faith in your religion/God? Does it even affect those who believe in no God at all? Again, this is what I meant by a two way street. Not all can be pleased. If you please one you displease another. Therefore how do you justify the decision made to allow one and not the other?
    Let me ask this question... I know that the US does not have a national Religion like other countries, but there still could be a freedom of religion and still have a national religion. What I am getting at is this... If Christianity was the US national religion would non Christian's still protest the "In God We Trust" on monies? Would they still protest creationism being in public schools? Prayer? Remember you still have the freedom to believe what you want. What I am getting at is, does "In God We Trust" violate this right? Does ELECTIVE prayer in school truly violate this right? Even when there was prayer it was not forced. Does the teaching of an ELECTIVE religion course violate freedom of religion? Does hearing "Merry Christmas" violate this right? I know this goes against separation of church and state, but even then a certain religion was not forced. Children still were not forced to pray, take religion courses, people aren't forced to celebrate Christmas, etc. Creationsim is not fact is the argument I hear, but to those who believe it, it is a fact. Forget separation of church and state for a moment. Tell me how you can possibly say that the teaching of some people's belief of evolution is any better or more appropriate or should be the only teaching than other's belief in creationism? Some may not want their children to hear the idea of creationism, but the same can be said for evolution. I know it may be hard to think about no separation in church and state, but bear with me as I have a point. There is a reason our founding fathers put "In God We Trust" on monies, there is a reason why religion and prayer was initially allowed in schools, etc. Why do away with that? Whether you agree or not, believe or not. Why do away with that? How does keeping these things around violate anyone's right? No one is forced to do anything involving any certain religion. Why separate church and state to begin with if no one is forced to be involved religiously?
    This is just my opinion, but hear me out... I believe separation was done because there were people out there who simply did not want religion (mostly Christianity simply because this was what was in the schools and on money) in anything they did/do. Notice I said WANT because they weren't forced, rights never violated. How is their want any better than the want of keeping things how they were/are? Therefore I will say it again, it may be thought that Christians make a big deal with certain things, but to me, the continued doing away with Christian things is making a big deal.
    So I say this last thing... Christians may protest many things, but think about it... whether you agree with the Christian view or not... the more time that passes the more Christianity is being taken away publicly. Christians don't want this because of the obvious. All Christians are doing is trying to keep laws, things, ways, whatever you want to say in our beliefs because that's what we agree with and believe in. That's what we feel is the best thing. Whether they stick or not, whether they are agreed upon or not, whether they are the right things for all or not, it is simply our beliefs in which some of us protest in hopes that people will see things the way we think they should be. I will say that some try to push this on everyone, not giving people the freedom to believe what they wish. I don't agree with this, but I do think that as long as it is civil there is absolutely nothing wrong with stating your opinions, beliefs, wants, etc in hopes that people may see it your way.
  • Nov 29, 2007, 09:00 AM
    jillianleab
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by MoonlitWaves
    Think about this for a minute. What you are seeing is the protest from Christians about stores not saying "Merry Christmas". But you forget to think about why it was changed to "Happy Holidays" in the first place. Why was it changed in the first place? It's more than likely a combination of things. One reason could be that the store owners do not wish to acknowledge just one belief. It could also be that those who are not Christian protest the saying of "Merry Christmas" since they do not celebrate Christmas. Whether it's for the better or no the point is Christians aren't the only ones protesting.

    I think I said it before, but maybe I didn't - I've NEVER seen someone protest a store for saying "Merry Christmas". I'm not saying it hasn't happened, but I've never seen/heard about it, which leads me to believe the STORES are the ones who decided to say "Happy Holidays" as a way to include their other customers in well-wishings. So, if the STORES made the decision because they want to be more inclusive, no, it's NOT because of protest from non-Christians.

    Quote:

    I'm not sure if it was you but someone asked would I or do I refuse to shop at these stores the rest of the year. This could have been a general question to anyone who answers too so I will answer. I don't refuse to shop anywhere, anytime of the year. It's not a big deal for me to hear "Happy Holidays". I am also all for fairness, especially when it concerns those things which are important, such as religion.
    It was me who asked, but it was a general question, not to anyone in particular.

    Quote:

    I have respect because I want respect. If you read the other thread in the Christianity topic you will see that I am a Christian who respects that prayer was taken out of school as a set time/group activity or however you phrase it. I have that respect because was it prayer in/for a different religion than mine I too would do the same protesting that was done to have prayer done away with as a set time. That's off the topic I know, but the point is I have respect for other people's right to their religion. What my argument was about, and I know I am repeating myself, is this... (1)No matter what you do you usually step on toes. For example; if you take away "Merry Christmas" you have stepped on Christians toes to please non-Christians. If you continue to say "Merry Christmas" you have stepped on non-Christian's toes. So how do you completely justify either one? You go with the lesser evil right? "Happy Holidays" basically respects all beliefs during this season. And I agree with that. I am defending the Christian thinking not only because I am a Christian but because whether you have made the better decision or not you can't fault someone for agreeing or disagreeing. Their beliefs make them think the way they do and they have a freedom to that. Let'em protest because they are standing up for what they believe in whether it's agreed upon or not, whether it's the best decision or not (I mean this as within the law). Think it ridiculous or absurd all you want, but they have just as much right as you have to disagree with them. See what I mean? (2) My argument was also this... Someone had said that Christians were making a big deal out of the greeting thing. My argument was that it seems to me that those who protest the saying of "Merry Christmas" is making the bigger deal as Christmas will still be all around them. How can hearing a Merry Christmas greeting bother them to this extent when until the Christmas season is over with they will see it everywhere they turn. It was simply a rebuttle against the statement that a big deal was being made from Christians and it may be, but we aren't the only ones.
    I've already said I fully support one's right to spend their dollars where they want, to protest, etc. If someone doesn't want to shop in stores that are run by black people, that's their right. They have the right to have that opinion and I have the right to think they are mistaken. They have the right to disagree with me. I'm not trying to say Christians should be FORCED to shop in stores which say "Merry Christmas" but rather to (hopefully) get through WHY the stores do such a thing and why it's not necessarily a demonstration of a "War on Christmas" or an example of Christian persecution. You're right, you can't make everyone happy, but when it is the STORE making the decision to use whatever greeting they want, is it necessary to declare it a "War"? Is it necessary to get upset? That's the behavior that I don't get; I really, truly, don't understand why anyone would care what someone says to them when it is a friendly greeting and it is someone you don't even know. That goes for the use of "Happy Holidays" "Merry Christmas", whatever. If you don't like it don't shop there, but why decalre a "War"? Why cause a public outcry? Aren't there more important things you could focus your energies on? Why not spend your dollars elsewhere and move on if it bothers you so much? (BTW, by "you" I mean the collective "you", not you specifically.)

    Quote:

    This, I agree, is way out of hand. Like I said earlier whether we think it ridiculous or not people have a right to protest and should be respected for standing up for what they believe in. I don't agree when they break laws like stealing books, destroying property, etc.
    I'm glad we both agree this behavior is unacceptable! :) Protesting is one thing, but destruction of property as a means of protest is quite another!

    Quote:

    I know you were addressing someone else with this but I would like to say something on it. The same questions could be asked to everyone else. Does hearing "Merry Christmas" lessen your faith in your religion/God? Does it even affect those who believe in no God at all? Again, this is what I meant by a two way street. Not all can be pleased. If you please one you displease another. Therefore how do you justify the decision made to allow one and not the other?
    No, hearing "Merry Christmas" doesn't cause me to pause for a moment, it doesn't change my personal beliefs whatsoever. My point in saying that is, if the STORE decides to say it, why do you (collective you) care so much? Does it hurt you inside to hear "Happy Holidays"? Does it compromise your beliefs? If not, what difference does it make what the stores say? I think that's pretty much the root of it - I just don't see what the big deal is. Leave it up to the stores on how inclusive/exclusive they want to be.

    Quote:

    Let me ask this question... I know that the US does not have a national Religion like other countries, but there still could be a freedom of religion and still have a national religion. What I am getting at is this... If Christianity was the US national religion would non Christian's still protest the "In God We Trust" on monies?
    It's important you know "In God We Trust" was added to our money in 1957. "Under God" was added to the Pledge in 1954. Neither has anything to do with the fouding fathers.

    You've gotten into some other issues (creationism, etc) that go pretty far off topic and have been discussed in other threads. So, in an effort to keep this thread on track, I'm not going to address those points. If, however, you want to start a new thread about those points and if the US had a national religion, I'd be happy to join it and address them there.

    Quote:

    So I say this last thing... Christians may protest many things, but think about it... whether you agree with the Christian view or not... the more time that passes the more Christianity is being taken away publicly. Christians don't want this because of the obvious. All Christians are doing is trying to keep laws, things, ways, whatever you want to say in our beliefs because that's what we agree with and believe in. That's what we feel is the best thing. Whether they stick or not, whether they are agreed upon or not, whether they are the right things for all or not, it is simply our beliefs in which some of us protest in hopes that people will see things the way we think they should be. I will say that some try to push this on everyone, not giving people the freedom to believe what they wish. I don't agree with this, but I do think that as long as it is civil there is absolutely nothing wrong with stating your opinions, beliefs, wants, etc in hopes that people may see it your way.
    I agree, there is nothing wrong with wanting to state your beliefs publicly, protest to what you don't believe in, and try to get the law to side with you. The problem is when extremists (on either side) want it "their way" at the exclusion of all others, with no flexibility and at the violation of other's rights. But here's the thing about Christianity being taken away publicly (as you put it); if you mean no public displays of the Wise men and so on, it's important to remember that as our society progresses, we are realizing other's beliefs and cultures are just as important as those of Christians. Businesses are starting to realize the importance of non-Christians who shop in their stores; communities are realizing the prevalence of non-Christians and want to demonstrate they appreciate EVERYONE not just some. As such, what used to be public Christian displays shift to secular displays. Just a few decades ago atheists couldn't be "public" or outspoken, we STILL can't get a set in Congress. So I think society is making a shift because of demand to more secular and more inclusive. Think about women's rights and their role in society now as opposed to fifty years ago. It's a natural shift as societies grow and change.
  • Nov 29, 2007, 10:19 AM
    MoonlitWaves
    It's important you know "In God We Trust" was added to our money in 1957. "Under God" was added to the Pledge in 1954. Neither has anything to do with the fouding fathers.

    You've gotten into some other issues (creationism, etc) that go pretty far off topic and have been discussed in other threads. So, in an effort to keep this thread on track, I'm not going to address those points. If, however, you want to start a new thread about those points and if the US had a national religion, I'd be happy to join it and address them there.

    Yeah, your right about the monies and pleadge, but it still goes collectively with the other things I said. My intentions were not to discuss these topics with you on this thread individually. I was using those examples and asking those various questions as a whole to go with what I had said above those questions about, "Does having them stay lessen your (collective you) faith or lack of?" This was in response to you asking to same question first, but about them being removed, taken away, changed, etc. Which you answered by saying that it was about society changing to recognize all beliefs. Do I make sense? Though I wish things could be the way they are/were because it is my belief, I like things that way, I can respect that our country is further recognizing that it has people with many different beliefs.
    The point is this, I have respect for all beliefs because I want respect for mine. I will talk about my beliefs, I will say why I disagree or agree, but I am not a protester (sign holder, marcher). Maybe I should be, but I am not. But even though I don't go so far as to hold signs and march I can understand why Christians do. I relate to their beliefs and feelings. Like I told you before I don't mind hearing "Happy Holidays" (in other words I'm not protesting it), but I was discussing this with you on the side of Christians because I can understand why they would rather hear "Merry Christmas" instead. Why some do protest things of this nature. This is of course civily. I think sometimes people forget to think about the shoe being on the other foot. Extremists want to force their beliefs, but they forget to think about how they would feel if someone was trying to force them to the other way of thinking. I also think that sometimes when something is protested like prayer out of schools, no "In God We Trust", no more "Merry Christmas" greetings that people fail to realize this is a change, that for those who believe or agree with, a change that's not wanted. Because they disagree or protest it they are sometimes thought of as ridiculous, going to far (I'm not talking about exremists), people wonder why they aren't passive, why the big deal, etc. My thoughts were that no matter which way you agree neither is lesser of a big deal, niether is ridiculous and niether should be passive in their beliefs. Therefore I say this... In the whole scheme of things not hearing "Merry Christmas" is not a big issue considering all things, but it still has a part in things being changed, things that some do not want changed. So, I can understand why one would disagree with not hearing Merry Christmas when checking out. Why one would try to keep it the way it is.
  • Nov 29, 2007, 11:18 AM
    jillianleab
    I understood why you brought up the money and other issues thing, but given that to respond to that effectively we'd get WAY off topic, I thought it best to just move on. I didn't mean to imply you were trying to take the thread off topic, or that I didn't understand your point. :)

    I understand why some would prefer to hear "Merry Christmas" too - that's what they've ALWAYS heard, that's what they are USED TO hearing, and people don't like change. People, in general, are quite resistant to change, especially when it's in regards to something they don't have a problem with. But society must change in order to grow. I just really wish the people who get in such a tizzy about something like this would stop and consider what it means in the grand scheme of things. In the grand scheme of things could you spend your time fighting for something that makes an actual DIFFERENCE in your life or someone else's? Something that directly has to do with your faith, not something that has been introduced and popularized by commercialism. Say, for example, your local mall decided to not have Santa posing for pictures this year. You get ticked because you take your kids EVERY year and you want your Santa picture! But is it worth the fight, the time, the energy and so on to DEMAND Santa be in the mall when Santa isn't even an actual Christian icon? Of course coming to that line of thinking requires looking at things from outside of the box, which many people don't do. It's also embracing (or just accepting) a change that you didn't want and don't agree with. That's tough for people, I get that. But it doesn't mean that with a bit of reflection and less prompting from media talking heads (Bill O'Reilly comes to mind) we can't simply move on to other issues.

    Some people might think that by my example I think people should just "give up" when change they don't like happens. I'd like to clarify - I think it's more important to pick your battles than fight them all. If you want your picture with Santa SO BAD that it's worth your time, energy and effort to fight for it, well, go right ahead. Same with the "Merry Christmas" thing. But I think if most people actually stopped and thought about it, they could probably think of something more deserving of their time. I prefer to spend my time here fighting for things that will make a real difference in the world, and in my opinion, what the clerk at Best Buy utters as I collect my bags makes no difference in my world whatsoever.
  • Nov 29, 2007, 01:13 PM
    michealb
    Don't Christmas and new years get celebrated within a week of each other. Don't most fundies celebrate the new year and Christmas. So maybe the store is saying Happy Holidays(plural as in two or more) to you in order to include the other holiday that celebrate a week after Christmas.

    Wasn't Christmas only adopted by the Christians as a way to convert pagans that had a really good holiday that they didn't want to lose when the switched religions. Just like easter. Haven't all you fundies wondered what a rabbit that brings eggs has to due with the resurrection of Jesus?
  • Dec 3, 2007, 12:02 PM
    De Maria
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by margog85
    The 'if you don't like it, leave' mentality is not necessarily one I agree with

    Not necessarily? But sometimes you do agree with it?

    Quote:

    . How about, if you don't like it, change it? If you don't like it, and other people don't like it, work to make it better?
    And that is what Christians have been doing from the birth of this nation. Christians left a tyrannical country to come to America to practice freedom of religion.

    Quote:

    I am happy in America,
    Very good.

    Quote:

    but that doesn't mean it is perfect- no society ever will be, everyone will have qualms with something- which is why it is our duty to not just sit back and accept the things we dislike about our country and say 'well, it'll never be perfect, so why try?' but instead to do our part to make improvements.
    Correct.

    Quote:

    Leaving an imperfect country does nothing except appease those who are either too stupid to see the problems or too apathetic to care that problems exist.
    People have left imperfect countries before when the imperfections got unbearable.

    As for me, I'm pretty tired about people beating up America in comparison to other countries because there is NO COMPARISON. America is head and shoulders above any country with respect to freedom and human rights.

    Quote:

    And that is your belief, based upon Christian morality, which you feel should be imposed upon others who may not share your belief.
    Again, you accuse me of imposing beliefs on someone? Is it just your style or do you not know how to articulate your sentences to say what you actually mean? Or do you not understand what I'm saying?

    I do not impose my beliefs on anyone. The fact is, that the United States is ruled by majority. Gays have the right to believe that gay marriage is valid. I have the right to believe the opposite. And since we, Christians and other people share the belief that only man and woman may be bound as husband and wife, and we are still the majority we have designed the government with that in mind.

    When those who believe that gays have the right to marry come to power, then they may design their government any way they wish.

    As for me, I believe gay marriage is wrong, I believe it is bad for the country, I believe it would undermine our economic system and that is what I deduce logically. In addition, it is against my religion. I am free to hold those beliefs and to tell others about my beliefs. That is the beauty of this country.

    Quote:

    I don't want to get into this topic here, it's completely unrelated. But evidently just another instance of the imposition of Christian morality upon secular culture.
    Apparently you simply aren't happy with the idea of majority rule. You would be real happy if you could impose your beliefs on everyone. But our constitution protects us from people who want to impose their beliefs upon us.

    Sincerely,

    De Maria
  • Dec 3, 2007, 12:07 PM
    De Maria
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jillianleab
    De Maria I think you need to read my sig and my posts a little more carefully. You have twice, in two separate threads taken what I've said and looked at it in a way that I have a negative view or hatred of Christians, or that I wish to take other's rights away. Nothing in my post about protests indicated whatsoever that I felt Christians shouldn't have the same rights as others, so please stop trying to paint me as someone who applies freedoms unequally....

    You referenced my last post to you. I asked a question. Are you referring to something else I may have said to you previously? Please provide the reference because I don't know what you are talking about. As the saying goes, "I slept since then."

    Sincerely,

    De Maria
  • Dec 3, 2007, 12:16 PM
    NeedKarma
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by De Maria
    America is head and shoulders above any country with respect to freedom and human rights.

    Nah, other countries are equal or better - Canada for instance.
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by De Maria
    Apparently you simply aren't happy with the idea of majority rule.

    That seems to be a dominant theme for you. Have you ever travelled somewhere where you were the minority?
  • Dec 3, 2007, 12:32 PM
    De Maria
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by NeedKarma
    Nah, other countries are equal or better - Canada for instance.

    Too cold.

    Quote:

    That seems to be a dominant theme for you. Have you ever travelled somewhere where you were the minority?
    This very country. Abortion is the law of the land. Most Christians believe abortion is murder of the unborn.

    We, responsible Christians, will continue to work through the Political System and the Law to have that overturned.

    Sincerely,

    De Maria
  • Dec 3, 2007, 12:41 PM
    NeedKarma
    That's what I figured. Travelling and meeting people from different religions, beliefs, colours, races, ethicities, etc. truly broadens the horizon. Living in fear of change is like being in your own little prison.

    Us non-religious persons are also working towards making sure that no one religion or theocracy dominates.
  • Dec 3, 2007, 04:34 PM
    kp2171
    several years ago, disappointed over the retail push to have christmas stuff out starting in late sept, early oct at the latest, my wife and I started calling the corporate holiday marathon Christhankoween.

    now, every year, when the blinking lights and ornaments are being shelved next to the back to school clearance racks, we blandly and coldy say

    "oh goody. its Christhankoween already."

    =P

    but then I'm an irritable, cranky, judgemental hack and it gives me another thing to complain about.
  • Dec 3, 2007, 04:54 PM
    NeedKarma
    Happy Festivus!
  • Dec 3, 2007, 05:00 PM
    margog85
    De Maria:

    I will make one final attempt to say my piece here, and leave it at that. I really don’t have the time and energy to say the same thing in 10 different ways, hoping to make myself clear, and then have what I say picked apart condescendingly by you. This, therefore, is my final post on the mater.

    You accuse me of not being happy in the U.S. and basically indicate that since I’m not happy, I should just leave. I stated that I disagree with that mentality (‘if you don’t like it, leave’) and you pick at my use of the word ‘necessarily’... to make what point, I’m not quite sure... perhaps to paint me as wishy-washy and not saying what I mean? Whatever the reason for your comment may be, my belief is this: in certain situations, circumstances in a country can become unbearable and all hope of progress in the foreseeable future is lost- at which point, walking away may be justifiable. Until that point of hopelessness is reached, however, it is our duty as citizens of a democracy to stand up for our beliefs and work to make changes that we feel are for the betterment of our society and our country.

    I have never once made a statement in this discussion in which I ‘beat up America in comparison to other countries’- if I remember correctly, it was YOU who drew the comparison of the U.S. to other countries- and I did not respond that other countries were better or worse, but simply that I am happy in the U.S. but that, as with any society, there are imperfections and things with which I am not entirely pleased, and stated my belief that it is the responsibility of each citizen to work for the changes they wish to see.

    Do not try to make me out as ‘anti-American’ because I believe that religious holidays need not be recognized by corporations (which exploit the holiday and distort the true meaning anyway). If you think that an attack on my credibility by painting me as ‘unpatriotic’, or acting as though you are a victim to my relentless personal attacks, will sway people into agreeing with your perspective, you are wrong.

    ‘Again you accuse me of imposing beliefs on someone? Is it just your style or do you not know how to articulate your sentences to say what you actually mean? Or do you not understand what I’m saying?

    I have made every effort to keep this discussion civil and respectful- there is absolutely no need for the condescending tone in this response. Your original statement was ‘All freedoms have a limit. The right to be married is limited by the sex of the individuals being married. That is what I believe.’ To which I responded that while that is your belief, it should not be imposed upon others who do not share your belief (by this belief being law, the belief IS imposed upon those who disagree). Maybe I should not fault you for your inability to understand, though... you simply may lack the ability to comprehend the difference between the statement ‘which you feel should be imposed upon others who do not share your belief’ (and see that law based on religious morals IS an imopsition of specific moral beliefs upon non-believers) and your accusation that I said ‘you are imposing your beliefs upon others’.

    Religious beliefs should not play a role in the determination of laws for those who do not share those religious beliefs- doing so converts religious moral law to federal and/or state law, and therefore makes our country a theocracy. You make the absurd accusation that I would ‘be real happy if [I] could impose [my] beliefs on everyone’- an extremely idiotic and ignorant statement. If this were the case, I would be doing what oh so many Christians do… trying to enact a law prohibiting straight people from marrying- telling straight people that they can either find a nice person of the same sex and settle down, be alone, or settle for a relationship that deserves no legal recognition.

    Instead, I believe there should be equality and that religious beliefs should not impact federal or state law- if you don’t agree that gay marriage is 'right', if it’s against your religious beliefs, then don’t marry someone of the same sex. Plain and simple. But don’t think that others, who do believe that gay marriage is fine based on their religious beliefs, or even based upon secular moral beliefs that reinforce a respect for the equality of all people, should be limited in legal protection and unable to marry the person they love. THAT is the imposition of the beliefs of one group upon another that does not share those beliefs. Whether you want to call it that or not, is up to you. But do not turn around and make accusations of me trying to impose my beliefs upon anyone. I think it is clear to any intelligent individual who has been following this discussion that that is far from the truth.

    Once again, I am not getting any further into the gay marriage debate here, it is off topic. I will discuss this with you in another thread should you choose to start it, but I will not debate you on this issue in a thread relating to the asinine insistence that everyone everywhere, regardless of their religious belief should wish everyone everywhere a Merry Christmas, even if the person they are wishing it to doesn’t celebrate the holiday. It makes no sense. It's illogical.

    If there is any issue to be fought here by Christias, it should be the COMMERCIALIZATION of your sacred holiday, not that the companies which are exploiting your religious tradition of exchanging gifts (a tradition stolen from the Pagan religions, mind you) say the holiday by name. You have the right to protest whatever you like- and I have the right to tell you that I think it’s ludicrous that of all things, THIS is a major issue for many Christians this time of year.
  • Dec 3, 2007, 08:03 PM
    De Maria
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by margog85
    De Maria:

    I will make one final attempt to say my piece here, and leave it at that.. .

    Are you sure?

    Quote:

    You accuse me of not being happy in the U.S. and basically indicate that since I’m not happy, I should just leave. I stated that I disagree with that mentality (‘if you don’t like it, leave’) and you pick at my use of the word ‘necessarily’... to make what point, I’m not quite sure...
    To make the point that in some cases you believe people should leave if they don't like the country in which they live. Its an anchor point. Establishing a point of agreement. You made it sound as though we disagree completely. As though leaving was altogether bad. But you did not make an absolute stance, since "necessarily" is absolute then 'not" necessarily is not..

    Quote:

    perhaps to paint me as wishy-washy and not saying what I mean?
    Well, yeah. The thought had crossed my mind.

    Quote:

    Whatever the reason for your comment may be, my belief is... walking away may be justifiable.
    My point exactly. It is obvious that our forefathers in this country left their homeland for that very reason.

    Quote:

    Until that point of hopelessness is reached, however, it is our duty as citizens of a democracy to stand up for our beliefs and work to make changes that we feel are for the betterment of our society and our country.
    And you see, coming from you that's sounds strange. Because you seem to object to Christians trying make things better for society and our country.

    Ask yourself this question. If you don't care whether a person says "Happy Holidays" or "Merry Christmas", then why do you object when a Christian wants to say Merry Christmas?

    And if you do care when one says "Merry Christmas" instead of "Happy Holidays", why don't you understand when others care about it as well?

    In this country we have the freedom to care. If you object to someone being vocal, then why only when Christians are vocal do you object? Why not when nonChristains are vocal?

    Quote:

    I have never once made a statement in this discussion in which I ‘beat up America in comparison to other countries’-...
    That's good. I simply made an explanation as to why I made the statement originally.

    Quote:

    Do not try to make me out as ‘anti-American’... will sway people into agreeing with your perspective, you are wrong.
    No actually. I'm just pointing out that you are very prone to tell people what you believe but you object vehemently when anyone expresses a belief which disagrees with yours.

    Quote:

    I have made every effort to keep this discussion civil and respectful- there is absolutely no need for the condescending tone in this response. Your original statement was ‘All freedoms have a limit. The right to be married is limited by the sex of the individuals being married. That is what I believe.’
    Note that I punctuated that with, "that is what I believe." Not with, "that is what you should believe". Therefore, I am simply informing you on where I stand on the matter.

    If you feel that is an imposition of my belief upon yours, then where is the basis for a civil discussion? I can't speak my mind. Whenever I do, I am accused of imposing my belief.

    Quote:

    To which I responded that while that is your belief, it should not be imposed upon others who do not share your belief (by this belief being law, the belief IS imposed upon those who disagree).
    Well, you didn't quite quote yourself. You kind of tweaked the language a bit to make it more palatable. Your exact words were:

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by margog85
    And that is your belief, based upon Christian morality, which you feel should be imposed upon others who may not share your belief. I don't want to get into this topic here, it's completely unrelated. But evidently just another instance of the imposition of Christian morality upon secular culture.

    Quote:

    Maybe I should not fault you for your inability to understand, though... you simply may lack the ability to comprehend the difference between the statement ‘which you feel should be imposed upon others who do not share your belief’ (and see that law based on religious morals IS an imopsition of specific moral beliefs upon non-believers) and your accusation that I said ‘you are imposing your beliefs upon others’.
    Uh? I think it is the other way around. I see a great big difference in the population getting together and peacefully voting whose belief will be implemented by majority rule AND the idea that I am imposing my belief upon anybody.

    Have you ever heard of the term, "democracy"? That means we arrive at decisions based on voting. That means that the minority should not impose their will upon the majority. Its not a perfect system, but it works better than any other democracy or other government in the world today. In my opinion.

    Quote:

    Religious beliefs should not play a role in the determination of laws...
    I don't agree. Our religious beliefs, or lack thereof are intimate parts of our being. We can't shed them and act as though we believe one thing at one time and another thing the next.

    Just as you have stated that you believe in standing up for your nonreligious beliefs, we believe in standing up for our religious beliefs.

    And that seems to be your only problem. You don't mind imposing your beliefs on others. But you don't even want to consider that a majority of people might come to agreement on a Christian ethic as a part of our rule of law.

    Quote:

    You make the absurd accusation that I would ‘be real happy if [I] could impose [my] beliefs on everyone’- an extremely idiotic and ignorant statement.
    Which you don't find quite idiotic or ignorant when you make the same accusation towards me? Very interesting.

    Quote:

    If this were the case, I would be doing what oh so many Christians do…
    In other words, you believe everyone should be apathetic. You want Christians to quit trying to make the world better as they see fit.

    Quote:

    Instead, I believe there should be equality and that religious beliefs should not impact federal or state law-
    And I believe they should.

    Quote:

    if you don’t agree that gay marriage is 'right', if it’s against your religious beliefs,.
    Well, this is way off topic, but the argument isn't as simple as you make it. And the fact is that all rights have their limits. And imposing homosexuality upon society would be just that, an "imposition" to something which is against our very nature.

    Quote:

    THAT is the imposition of the beliefs of one group upon another that does not share those beliefs.
    And again, if homosexuals gather enough strength to change society's opinion, they can change the law. Just as abortionists have changed the law in their favor.

    Quote:

    Whether you want to call it that or not, is up to you. But do not turn around and make accusations of me trying to impose my beliefs upon anyone. I think it is clear to any intelligent individual who has been following this discussion that that is far from the truth.
    I too will let reasonable people decide.

    Quote:

    Once again, I am not getting any further into the gay marriage debate here, it is off topic.
    Agreed.

    Quote:

    I will discuss this with you in another thread should you choose to start it, but I will not debate you on this issue in a thread relating to the asinine insistence that everyone everywhere, regardless of their religious belief should wish everyone everywhere a Merry Christmas, even if the person they are wishing it to doesn’t celebrate the holiday. It makes no sense. It's illogical.
    Again, you are characterising me as making an "asinine insistence that everyone everywhere, irregardless of their religious belief should wish everyone everywhere a Merry Christmas, even if the person they are wishing it to doesn’t celebrate the holiday."

    Obviously, anyone who reads my statements will see that my only insistence is that Christians also have the right to object and that Christians should also vote wth their dollars.

    Quote:

    If there is any issue to be fought here by Christias, it should be the COMMERCIALIZATION of your sacred holiday,
    Which we do.

    Quote:

    not that the companies which are exploiting your religious tradition of exchanging gifts (a tradition stolen from the Pagan religions, mind you)
    Not true. It is a strictly Christian tradition. Just because pagans may have also done something similar does not mean we copied them.

    However, even if we did, which we didn't, what's the harm? And, what do you care? You aren't Christian.

    Quote:

    say the holiday by name. You have the right to protest whatever you like- and I have the right to tell you that I think it’s ludicrous that of all things, THIS is a major issue for many Christians this time of year.
    Actually, its not a MAJOR issue.. Its an annoyance. Its like someone coming to your birthday party and ignoring you. Or like someone, not the bride, coming to the wedding dressed all in white. Hey, its our [B]Holy Day[/B In fact, its our "Holy Season". If certain stores don't want to recognize it, we'll spend our dollars with those that will.

    That;s freedom!

    As for major issues. Feeding the hungry, caring for the sick and visiting the lonely. Those are major Christian issues.

    Sincerely,

    De Maria
  • Dec 3, 2007, 08:07 PM
    De Maria
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by NeedKarma
    That's what I figured. Travelling and meeting people from different religions, beliefs, colours, races, ethicities, etc. truly broadens the horizon. Living in fear of change is like being in your own little prison.

    Living in a metropolitan town helps also.

    What change are you afraid of?

    Quote:

    Us non-religious persons are also working towards making sure that no one religion or theocracy dominates.
    That is fine. Please stick to legal means to do so.
  • Dec 3, 2007, 08:08 PM
    kp2171
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by De Maria
    We, responsible Christians, will continue to work through the Political System and the Law to have that overturned.

    De Maria

    OK... no matter how I feel about all the other points in this fray, you just cannot whine about how those who aren't happy in this country won't leave, and then state proudly that you are happy to stay here and fight for what you believe through the political system.

    You just got to drop the "if you dont like it leave" angle you threw in there. It weakens your argument.

    Every time I hear that... and most of the time lately its someone b!tching about how people who are against the war are against the country and should leave... it just makes me think of 5th grade debate.

    As a Christian, itd be personally nice for others to wish me a Merry Christmas, since thatd mean I was around others who believed as me, but I'm not getting my panties in a wad cause somebody tells me happy holidays. If a gay man wants to celebrate Felis Navidude I couldn't care less.

    My son will learn about God through his family and his church. I don't need his school or his favorite toystore to indoctrinate him in any religious beliefs.
  • Dec 3, 2007, 08:20 PM
    De Maria
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jillianleab
    De Maria I think you need to read my sig and my posts a little more carefully. You have twice, in two separate threads taken what I've said and looked at it in a way that I have a negative view or hatred of Christians, or that I wish to take other's rights away. Nothing in my post about protests indicated whatsoever that I felt Christians shouldn't have the same rights as others, so please stop trying to paint me as someone who applies freedoms unequally. I said very clearly in my first post of the things Christians specifically were doing, I never said they shouldn't do them, so for you to ask if I think Christians should not be allowed to protest and then say "That's what I wanted you to say" is ridiculous and pompous. Read more carefully and you will understand the messages instead of reading what you THINK I'm saying and trying to stir up trouble.

    You've just confirmed that my simple words, "that is what I wanted you to say" were right on the money. I meant that I simiply wanted you to clarify your stance. Previously you sounded very one-sided. But when you specified that you believed in those freedoms also for Christians, that is what I wanted you to say. In other words, there is no argument there.

    Quote:

    You've done it again with "are you insinuating that only Christians do childish things?". Where in my post, in ANY post did I say or indicate that?
    See the little "?" at the end. That means it's a question. Since all you mentioned were Christians misbehaving, I wanted you to clarify whether you are insinuating that only Christians misbehave?

    A simple "no" would have sufficed.

    Quote:

    And passing off the information I passed on about pages being torn from books as "one person's allegations" and there is no "proof" implies you think either 1. I'm a liar or 2. The staff at my county library is full of liars. But you apparently think everyone is "out to get the Christians" so of course this must be made up.
    I guess I need more than a stranger's say so on the internet. I'm sorry if you think that means I am accusing you of lying. But I've met quite a few people who make unsubstantiated statements. Now, if you could point to a headline or a news article or some tangible proof that Christians are known to go into your library and tear up books, then I'll be more likely to believe it.

    Just last week I was in a debate with an atheist who said that "all intelligent people in this century were atheist". I challenged that statement and she got all bent out of shape. But it seems strange to me that only atheists should be intelligent and only Christians tear books apart in libraries.

    Quote:

    Either way, I no longer wish to discuss things with you, as you are rude and try to provoke people. Consider yourself officially added to my "ignore" list.
    Thanks. I reserve the right to respond to any anti-Christian messages you might write however.

    Sincerely,

    De Maria
  • Dec 3, 2007, 08:34 PM
    De Maria
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by kp2171
    OK... no matter how I feel about all the other points in this fray, you just cannot whine about how those who aren't happy in this country won't leave, and then state proudly that you are happy to stay here and fight for what you believe through the political system.

    Like you are whining now?

    Quote:

    you just got to drop the "if you dont like it leave" angle you threw in there. It weakens your argument.
    I don't think so.

    Quote:

    every time I hear that... and most of the time lately its someone b!tching about how people who are against the war are against the country and should leave... it just makes me think of 5th grade debate.
    That wasn't my point though, was it? When you decide to discuss what I actually said, let me know.

    Quote:

    as a Christian, itd be personally nice for others to wish me a Merry Christmas, since thatd mean I was around others who believed as me, but I'm not getting my panties in a wad cause somebody tells me happy holidays. If a gay man wants to celebrate Felis Navidude I couldn't care less.
    But your panties are in a wad because others don't act like you? Are you setting yourself up as the example we should all follow?

    Quote:

    my son will learn about God through his family and his church. I don't need his school or his favorite toystore to indoctrinate him in any religious beliefs.
    That's great. But that is pretty much off topic. There's another thread on prayer in school or you can start one of your own.

    Sincerely,

    De Maria
  • Dec 3, 2007, 09:25 PM
    kp2171
    I'm whining by pointing out how you are using a double standard in your argument when you wonder why people who are unhappy with the state of affairs in the US just don't leave?

    Really? That's ALL you have?? The "im not but you are" rubber-glue playground argument?

    Know what? you are right.

    Though I agree with a lot of what you say, you are absolutely correct. You have the right to lace your discussions with faulty reasoning and bad logic. Its like the person with bad breath that is speaking useful things but you just can't stand to be near them. Oh well. Never mind. Carry on...
  • Dec 4, 2007, 06:30 AM
    ordinaryguy
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by kp2171
    really? thats ALL you have??? the "im not but you are" rubber-glue playground arguement?

    Yes, that is all she has. I smell a thread closure looming.
  • Dec 4, 2007, 08:58 AM
    jillianleab
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by ordinaryguy
    Yes, that is all she has. I smell a thread closure looming.

    I was thinking the same thing. The word "troll" is also coming to mind, but maybe that's just me...
  • Dec 4, 2007, 11:43 AM
    De Maria
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by kp2171
    I'm whining by pointing out how you are using a double standard in your argument when you wonder why people who are unhappy with the state of affairs in the US just don't leave?

    Really? That's ALL you have?? The "im not but you are" rubber-glue playground argument?

    I think you are projecting. Its kind of hard to debate intelligently with "got your panties tied in a knot" type comments. Since you had nothing more intelligent to contribute, I simply gave you the old faithful, "back at ya" response.

    So, the old rubber glue playground response is still handy when someone makes juvenile comments.

    Quote:

    know what? you are right.
    I know.

    Quote:

    though I agree with a lot of what you say, you are absolutely correct. You have the right to lace your discussions with faulty reasoning and bad logic.
    Point out the faulty reasoning and bad logic. Please make sure and quote me. It seems a trait of the folks on this board to make up arguments and attribute them to their opponents in order to pretend to win an argument.

    Quote:

    its like the person with bad breath that is speaking useful things but you just can't stand to be near them. Oh well. Never mind. Carry on...
    There you go again. Back at you, fella.
  • Dec 4, 2007, 11:45 AM
    De Maria
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by ordinaryguy
    Yes, that is all she has. I smell a thread closure looming.

    He.

    If you can close it, do so.
  • Dec 4, 2007, 11:49 AM
    De Maria
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jillianleab
    I was thinking the same thing. The word "troll" is also coming to mind, but maybe that's just me....

    No, I thought so too.
  • Dec 4, 2007, 02:41 PM
    Soldout
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by margog85
    I really disagree with a lot of the anger and frustration revolving around this issue.

    Here in the US, your can NO LONGER PRETEND TO BE MARTYRS FOR YOUR BELIEFS. THE WORLD IS NOT OUT TO GET YOU. STOP LOOKING FOR SOMETHING TO COMPLAIN ABOUT!

    Nobody is picking on you by trying to include others who don't agree with you or share your beliefs. Nobody is putting down your holiday by not saying it by name- they're simply acknowledging the fact that our country is not a Theocracy, not everyone celebrates Christmas- so why make that assumption?

    People who are shopping at this time of year could be doing so for a number of reasons- how is a store associate supposed to know what religion each customer they encounter is a member of, which holiday each customer celebrates and how to adequately wish that customer an enjoyable holiday season? And, on top of that, why give the associate a hard time? If you're so against the consumerism of the season, why would you put a minimum wage over-worked employee through hell for a policy that they didn't implement, and which they would likely lose their jobs for breaking? That's just the spirit of christmas these days, I suppose, hmm?

    I would think it odd for someone to wish me a merry christmas if I were in a store- how do they know I'm not Jewish? Muslim? Or hell, even an atheist?

    I would be insulted that someone would make an assumption about my religious beliefs, and actually am happy that people use more generic terms when wishing me well. In a situation where we don't have much time to get to know someone on a personal level, a wish of happiness during a season where many people are celebrating SOMETHING is welcome in my book.

    Demanding that everyone acknowledge that it's the CHRISTMAS season implies that there is very little respect for those of other religious beliefs- while it may be the christmas season for you, it is NOT for everyone else. When do others get to demand, say, the Happy Chaunnuka they deserve? Are their beliefs not as signifcant as yours?

    Why people focus so much on this is beyond me. Do you think Jesus would really give two s if people said 'Merry Christmas', 'Happy Channuka', 'Happy Ramadan', 'Happy Quanza', 'Happy Winter Solstice'... as long as they were being good to one another, loving eachother, and wishing eachother well? Would Jesus become as irate as many Christians I've seen over this issue?

    We have no right and no place to mandate the religious beliefs of others- nor to mandate the holidays other people celebrate- so why make generalizations that may offend others? If you're offended by not being acknowledge directly, imagine the offense to those who are directly excluded in a 'Merry Christmas' wish-

    Please.

    I really think that there are bigger battles to fight than this, don't you?

    I case you haven't noticed Christ is the reason for the season. For those who are not Christian and hate Christians you can pretend the holiday does not exist. Don't put decorations on your house, don't buy a christmas tree and don't get you kids presents and you can also go to work on the 25th. I don't understand why other religions or athiests are trying to dilute a christian celebration by trying to make it their own by saying Happy holiday. What is the Holiday for, I will tell you it is about the birth of our savior. If you don't believe in Him & it bothers you, lock yourself up in your house and cpme out on the 26th when the season is over. For every Holiday there is a reason! 4th of July -Independence, verterans day, memorial day etc all have reason for the day. The reason for the 25th of December is to celebrate the birth of Christ. It is not just a "holiday" for no reason.
  • Dec 4, 2007, 02:51 PM
    Soldout
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by NeedKarma
    That's what I figured. Travelling and meeting people from different religions, beliefs, colours, races, ethicities, etc. truly broadens the horizon. Living in fear of change is like being in your own little prison.

    Us non-religious persons are also working towards making sure that no one religion or theocracy dominates.


    I am a Christian and I have been to 12 different countries on all 5 contenets so I am more likely than not more exposed than you are. So don't equate athiesim to being open minded because I can argue that atheist are the most close minded people on the planet. But I won't go there.
  • Dec 4, 2007, 03:43 PM
    NeedKarma
    So vindictive. Why?
  • Dec 4, 2007, 04:54 PM
    De Maria
    Quote:

    margog85 agrees: Apparently, it is the Christian way. To be condescending, self-righteous, and always see the ways they are 'victimized' by society.
    You continually make statements such as these. That is a clear example of anti-Christian bigotry.

    This is clear evidence, that if Christians feel victimized, it is because of people like you.

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:46 AM.