IF you are referring to comparing my views with that of your wife, you are seriously misinformed. NOT only do you misquote my words, you then turn around to use them against me.. I DO NOT HAVE ANY VIEW THAT I FEEL IS RELIGIOUS< FIRST OFF, I also do not ever expect anyone to think MY view is the only correct one. I think I have stated that numerous times and on numerous posts. I BELIEVE my own perspective based on my experiences and my upbringing, just like everyone else. MAYBE you don't hear it that way, so you jump into it to find a faulty word and then act like your response is the universal truth when in fact, other than your reference to "objective evidence" ,you have haven't got a leg to stand on.
I don't think (BELIEVE) being aware of energy, the ability to love and be loved, or referring to a creator, has to be about religion or about objective evidence. IT has to do with our individual perceptions of what we believe to be true and correct.
I think your biggest problem is labeling people. I find it almost comical that you are so narrow minded and yet that is the same thing that you speak against. If I am one thing, it isn't narrow minded. I respect your view and I am not disagreeing with FACTS.. I know what a fact is, but interpreting every statement, issue or problem will be different with each person who observes it. FACT, (EXAMPLE) Someone could have the same effects while taking a prescribed medicine as they could taking a placebo (without knowing the difference) , while someone else doesn't feel anything. If someone doesn't feel anything, does that make them more right than the person who does? OR is it a matter of personal perspective?
YOUR view of what could be perceived as factual data that is subject to ALL human beings, MIGHT ACTUALLY BE what someone perceives as accurate information that applies more specifically to them and only them.
MOREOVER< I am not a THEIST nor do I have problem with any approach, except one that is limited in scope. YOUR thoughts aren't much different than someone who is absolutely resolved in their own religion. NEITHER is absolute... and yet I am not religious, nor am I spouting what is true for everyone, but you do not respect my view either.
YOur approach doesn't explain every mystery of the universe and doesn't take away from all the other perspectives on this board. Because you are overzealous in your responses, doesn't make them more accurate. YOu don't have all the answers and your argument that objective evidence is the only way to prove everything, is quite a slippery slope. You married your wife because you love her, is there anyway to actually PROVE that love exists? OR is it just something you know to be true? Do you have a connection with your spouse? Is it something you can show or prove? (Other than the physical things you do for each other) or is it something you feel that is between you. This is what I am trying to explain. NOT everything that exists or is known to be "TRUE" isn't a fact that is proven with objective evidence. THAT IS one way of proving theories or statements of fact. IT is one way.. NOT THE ONLY WAY, NOT THE UNIVERSAL TRUTH FOR EVERYTHING>.
So in a way, everything is relative.. What you see as beautiful, may or may not be true to someone else, that doesn't make it less beautiful. What you see as ethical and moral, to someone else isn't. These are issues that we have to recognize. NOT everything can be proven, nor will everything be understood or proven. WE AREN'T supposed to know everything, prove everything or have all the answers, that is why there are people who come up with their own theories and find evidence to support them. DO YOU see that? OR is it all just the same ground to you? YOUR approach isn't the proper one. (IN MY OWN OPINION)
