Quote:
I read the so called evidence however I am able to scientifically refute it.
You haven't used science to either refute or support anything.
Quote:
Please show me a sequense of fossils of a whale evolving into a land animal. I would love to see this fossil evidence.. so would the world.
Your scientific ignorance is showing again. I said the fossil evidence clearly shows the progression of whales, not the reverse.
Micro evolution is an observable FACT, I have never denied that. Changes WITHIN Species have been observed, however darwinists take the leap of faith that these small changes within species will create an entirely new, never seen before species. Bacteria do evolve and develop new traits to adapt to new environments, however they don't evolve and ceased to be a bacteria and evolved into say, a virus. The bacteria is still bacteria.
The Bacteria example is a perfect example of
MICRO evolution this not "new" information it is specialisation
within the bacteria.
Let me explain. We see organisms become more
specialized as they adapt to their environment, or when speciation occurs. Sometimes these changes might even be beneficial despite being an overall loss of information. For example, beetles on a windy island will sometimes lose their wings due to a degenarative mutation. This mutation is actually beneficial in this circumstance because the beetles aren’t able to fly and be blown off into the ocean. But even though this mutation is beneficial,
it still resulted in a net loss of information, which says nothing for Macro evo.
Scientists have seen bacteria become antibiotic resistant. They have seen bacteria become bigger from mutations. But have they ever seen bacteria become anything other than bacteria? In fact, with over a hundred years of work with Ecoli behind us, (at 20 minutes per generation time, that's over 2 1/5 MILLION generations of ecoli minimum that have been witnessed you do the math), and despite forcing or encouraging mutations, they still cannot get anything but E.coli.
