Quote:
Originally Posted by wewed100606
She could be a fat liar for all I know, but I don't. He could be a great guy and she could be a stingy little gold digger,who knows. Better yet, he could be worse then she is letting on... I don't know!
My posts clearly present a neutral position that is centered around a fair compromise, I have only suggested that if there is an unwillingness on his behalf to work with her, then he may not be in it for the right reasons... That's a maybe and it certainly is reciprocal.
I agree her input through out this discussion on her behalf would have been beneficial, but it didn't happen.
The point is you have passed judgment yourself without knowing all the facts and are criticizing the other members for their effort and opinions:
"People need to not respond on emotion and outword appearances. If these questions were so outwordly simple these people would not be on here asking them. We are no smarter than they are. All you women should be ashamed for making this out to be some battle of the sexes. And for the lady who TALKED TO MANY MATURE MEN and SAY THIS IS A CON and RUNS RAMPID WHERE YOUR FRIEND IS FROM (not this country)...get a clue...that is why in your friends country they still ride mules to the maket and use outhouses and oil lanterns. GROW UP!
Sure some guy on here had some fun, but no less than the woman. Get off your high horse."
"CLASSIC FEMALE MENTALITY IN A RELATIONSHIP:
"What's mine is mine and what's yours is ours"
End of Story"
I merely have suggested that courtesy and benefit of doubt be granted to any member as opposed to calling out as a liar. If you feel the story is too one sided to gauge an accurate or true response, then I suggest you say nothing.