Originally Posted by prencilia31
I understand that he is unavailable, and all that...I still don't think that gives anyone any right to call me a whore. I can take conductive criticism, but namecalling is another thing. Again, the word "whore" defines someone who sleeps with someone for money,,,in other words, it is a slang term for prostitute!!!!!! I did not sleep with him for money. And if he is really that committed, then I wouldnt have his number, etc. so please stop making it look as if I am TAKING something from someone. It's okay to say that Im being used, etc, or whatever, I can take that because I probably am. But to be called a WHORE for liking someone that liked me back, or whatever, is an overstatement. I never have or never will sleep with a guy for money or material things, that's what WHORES do. That's whats wrong in this world, and thats the reason some people don't take advice too well, because there are some out there that do not know how to give advice without attaching a label to someone. You are acting as if I TOOK this man away, or worse, tried to RAPE him. Yes, he is attached, and he too should have thought about that. It takes two people to do anything. And being legally married and bound by vows is extremely different from 'common law' marriage or courting. Otherwise, the same rules that apply to married couples would apply to single ones. Again, do you realize that we are just talking about ONE Person. He and She are not married, so this case doesn't apply. I guess I posted on the wrong site for advice, because people don't seem to do their math before making comments.