Thanks again for your answers. I thought that's what it meant; that my brother was the sole owner of the property because of the way it was worded about my father releasing to my brother, and heirs; of which there are none, the property. At this point it's really not a big deal because I have a house that I own, and I did write my brother a letter telling him what I think, and how I didn't have to manipulate, connive, and get Deeds all twisted around to get my house. He's got that house so tied up in mortgage after mortgage that I wouldn't want any part of it anyway. I just wanted the proof of what he did to go about getting the house, and I told him I know exactly what he did. And yes, ties have been severed, and I doubt they will ever be tied again. I told him with him being HIV+ that the day will come when when he will need his brothers; there are 4 of us, and I am the eldest, and I asked him to think about which one of us does he think will be there for him when he will eventually need us. It's sad, but it is what it is.