yeah hind sight is always 20-20. I'll ask it again and I want an honest answer . What would the Democrats and radical left (one in the same) had done if Trump had in the middle of the Senate trial had said that we had to impose martial law like authority on the country to fight an unseen virus ;when the 1st deaths in the US were not even recorded until February 29 ;a month later ?

Dems would have looked very foolish as the virus in China came to America wouldn't they. I would imagine repubs would have hammered the hell out of the dems and as you remember dems made an abrupt about face on the ban, because they had no choice, so all the dufus had to say was what Navarro told him to say.

Meanwhile Trump's medical expert was saying mid-January that there was doubt the virus could spread person to person. He also downplayed it's impact on America saying the 5 cases in the US were Chinese travelers . Fauci also praised China for it's transparency

The WHO's Dr. David Heymann said it was unlikely to be spread airborne .

The CDC on Jan 24 had a press release

that said “the immediate risk of this new virus to the American public is believed to be low” and instead asking that the public refrain from traveling to China and focus on the seasonal flu rather than the minimal risk of the coronavirus.

Navarro was the trade rep. Those were the scientists .

and how was the compliant press reporting the virus on the last week of January?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVDP...ature=emb_logo

Boy did they look pretty stupid! They same ones who said the dufus was really stupid. Let's face it, we all looked pretty stupid back then. No I won't put your own quote out there.

8)