Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Physics (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=258)
-   -   Density, radius and g (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=82790)

  • Apr 15, 2007, 07:17 AM
    albear
    density, radius and g
    The earth has density rho(p) and radius R. the gravitational field strength at the surface is g. what is the gfs at the surface of a planet of density 2p and radius 2R.
    A g
    B 2g
    C 4g
    D 16g

    what is the equation I would use to solve this
  • Apr 17, 2007, 04:11 PM
    ebaines
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by albear
    The earth has density rho(p) and radius R. the gravitational field strength at the surface is g. what is the gfs at the surface of a planet of density 2p and radius 2R.
    A g
    B 2g
    C 4g
    D 16g

    what is the equation i would use to solve this

    The general expression for gravitational force of attraction between two bodies is GMm/R^2, where G is the gravitational constant, M and m are the masses of the two bodies, and R is the distance betweentheir centers of gravity. Applied to determine the weight of a body at the surface of the earth, G, M (mass of the earth) and R (radius of the earth) are constant. Hence we express the weight of the body at the surface of the earth as g*m, so g is equal to GM/R^2.

    Does this help?
  • Apr 18, 2007, 08:11 AM
    albear
    thank you for answering, yes it does help but I should have been more specific when asking what equation to use, I was referring to how do I link density (p) to Gm so that I can then try to solve the question. Do you know how I can relate them ?
  • Apr 18, 2007, 08:25 AM
    asterisk_man
    mass=density * volume
    therefore, mass is directly proportional to density
  • Apr 18, 2007, 08:33 AM
    albear
    OK so g=G(p*v)/R^2 right so therefore if p and R were both *2 then the 2s would cancel out giving g as the answer right?
  • Apr 18, 2007, 08:34 AM
    asterisk_man
    I think the difference in r that would be in the v will have an effect also
  • Apr 18, 2007, 08:36 AM
    albear
    ? I'm sorry I don't quite understand that
  • Apr 18, 2007, 08:38 AM
    asterisk_man


    I think this is right.
    Can you see how the extra radius increased the mass substantially while simultaneously decreasing the field strength?
  • Apr 18, 2007, 09:00 AM
    albear
    4/3piR^3 is the volume of a sphere but yes I can see the reason why now it's the inverse square law thanks (on the second to last line of working there is a mistake in
    2p(4/3)pi8R^3=16p(4/3)pi8R3) so g=Gm/R2 but m=g*V and V=(4/3)piR3. Thank you for your help
  • Apr 18, 2007, 09:38 AM
    asterisk_man
    Thanks for catching the mistake! I've fixed it now. Let me know if you need any more help with this.

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:47 AM.