Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Other Law (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=190)
-   -   Legal terms of Kang-kem v paine case study (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=819490)

  • Dec 16, 2015, 03:36 PM
    sabina2065
    Legal terms of Kang-kem v paine case study
    I am not clear with legal terms of this case. Anyone elaborate it.
  • Dec 16, 2015, 04:00 PM
    smoothy
    If you want an answer since this is homework... you better take time and tell us what parts you DO understand and what parts you don't and why.
  • Dec 16, 2015, 04:28 PM
    joypulv
    You don't even tell us what country, or what state if US...
    make a list of terms and use your law dictionary first.
    THEN ask.
  • Dec 16, 2015, 10:31 PM
    Fr_Chuck
    It is a famous Australia case from 2004 that deals with partnership (what is required to constitute a partnership.

    There are 100's of briefs on the case online, there are 100's of essays on the case online.

    If you will ask more specific question, or explain what you think, I would be glad to discuss the case.

    It is well described in the book "Concise Corporation Law" by Julie Cassidy. A must if you are into the study of Corporation Law.

    A big issue is how it compares to the Partnership Act of 1892

    This is a common case for your country, to address many of those issues.

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:55 AM.