Vet care? Only for the rich?
This debate started on another thread, and I didn't want to continue hijacking it, so I figured it was time to bring the debate to its own thread.
Vet care is expensive. Anyone that has a pet knows this. If your pet gets sick you can spend a months, or even more, worth of pay, and still not get an answer, or a healthy pet.
I made a comment in this other thread that most vets are rich. Another respected member disagreed.
I'm sure there are vets that aren't rich, because they're fair. I've found one in my lifetime, that didn't gouge us for every last penny we had just to fix our beloved fur baby. The rest charged us through the roof, usually didn't solve the issue, and then continued gouging us for continued care of an issue they never diagnosed to begin with.
When our beloved Jasper became ill we took him to the vet many times in the 5 days from the start of his illness, until the end. Test after test, hundreds of dollars here and there. We never got a diagnosis. Many hundreds of dollars later on tests and medication that didn't work, or tell us what was going on, he couldn't even lift his head. It was decided that ending things would be best for him. With no diagnosis, and no improvement, he was dying a slow painful death. So to add insult to injury, after paying all this money to help him, we had to pay more money for them to kill him.
Not that it's the vets fault. But really, who can afford to spend thousands of dollars when their pet is sick? Should only the super rich have pets, since they're really the only ones that can afford an emergency? What about all the animals in the shelters? Shouldn't there be a way for an average family to afford to have a pet, and afford to make sure that that pet is healthy, and happy?
I pay over $400 a year just to have my two dogs vaccinated. I paid $300 to have my one store bought rabbit neutered. The other three, one was found on the street and too old to spay, the other two were adopted from the shelter and were already fixed when we adopted them for a fee of $25.
All vets may not be rich, but neither are the people that come to them for help. So what's the solution? Should we not allow anyone that isn't wealthy to have pets? I know that there are vets that make a living, but don't gouge their patients, I've found one of those vets, and I've had friends that have found those vets. There are vets out there that actually became vets to help animals. But the majority I've found are only in it for the money, and they aren't living paycheck to paycheck like the rest of us.
Don't have the cash, and your animal is sick, they won't even look at the animal. Come back when you have the money and maybe, after many tests and a few thousand dollars, we'll be able to help, but probably not. Do you want to try a blood test? It will cost $250, and we probably won't figure out what's wrong by doing it, but hey, you're already spending a fortune because you love your pet, so we'll try to get every penny we can out of you before your pet dies.
So what's the solution so that all animals can receive the care they need, and anyone that is willing to give an animal a good home, can afford to do so?
Sorry if I sound bitter, but truth told, I am.