Do you notice that since George W. Bush has been in office, different parts of the world have had to overcome huge obsticles.

These are just a few of the obsticles the nation has to deal with. Rather than just trying to deal with him and his bull... 9/11 attacks on the WTC, Tsunami in Sri Lanka, along with the Earthquake that started it all, all those mudslides in California, & Nevada.

I don't understand why most of the American population voted for him in the first place. He's repetitive in what he says to the nation (election), can't speak proper english whatsoever, and is just plain stupid...

That's just my thought, along with other people that are on the same side I am.

You're absolutely right, every problem incurred during 2000-Present is President Bush's fault. The millions of people free to live without fear of being killed by their leader, the people of america getting tax cuts. Woe is us.

You have the politics of a communist. You sound like Dan Rather with your liberal garbage. Take it to the trash.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dancer1

I don't understand why most of the American population voted for him in the first place. He's repetitive in what he says to the nation (election), can't speak proper english whatsoever, and is just plain stupid...

---

... Because most Americans are repetitive, can't speak proper English, and are just plain stupid. :)

Many others are fundamentalists who want non-Christians to live according to fundamentalist "Puritan" morals. (No offense to anyone religious, I don't mean you :)). They are very worried we might be able to (gasp!) save lives by growing new organs, or (gasp!) remove the religious context of marriage from the lawbooks.

I hardly think you can blame him for a tsunami, though. :D

Quote:

---

The millions of people free to live without fear of being killed by their leader

---

... and who now have to live with the fear of being killed in the crossfire of revolt...
Funny, I thought someone announced the war was over...

What clowns! The news media is reporting every bit of crime in Iraq currently. Why don't they report all the crime ni California alone? Don't you see that? The media FOCUSES on the crime in Iraq to make it appear lost, If the Iraqi media reported all of the crime in the US, they wouldn't have a very accurate picture of the US. Besides, the vast majority is secure from these killers, and be sure that the Iraqis will not stand for it forever.

Another thing, according to your logic, we shouldn't have attacked Hitler. He never harmed us, only the Japanese attacked, the Germans never attacked the USA. Why did we go in there to take hitler out? What did Hitler do to people that Hussein did not?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Avatar

Why don't they report all the crime ni california alone?

---

They do - we're just all immune to the violence in America by now.

The reason the US attacked Hitler,was that Hitler declared war on the US on the 10th December 1941.After Pearl Harbor,Hitler fulfilled his pledge to honor the axis pact with Japan.
Churchill,the UK's leader had been 'whispering' in Roservault's ear since late 1940-autumn 41 to get the US into Europe's war.Hence land-lease.

Britain had supported the Soviet Union since Germany's attack on June 21,1941,but could do little to help with armaments.Hence the US sent 'stuff' through Iran.
US shipping had been escorting British merchant ships across the Atlantic since late 1940 anyway.The Germans were itching to pick a fight with the US because of this.

Once the US came into the war after Pearl Harbor,their war economy swung into top gear,and hey presto,world super power.

Incidentally,as a Brit,I think Bush is an idiot,but he had nothing to do with the Tsunami!

Latest estimate,250,000 dead or missing.
Don't stop your support to various world charities helping out please.


Postscript.

Hussein has/had oil.Why else invade a dictator you paid for over the years with your taxes?


Best wishes,
Nez.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Avatar

Another thing, according to your logic, we shouldn't have attacked Hitler. He never harmed us, only the Japanese attacked, the Germans never attacked the USA. Why did we go in there to take hitler out? What did Hitler do to people that Hussein did not?

---

I don't think your comparison of the Iraq War to WW2 is at all an accurate one. I believe you could probably make a better case comparing it to Vietnam.