Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Accounting (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=19)
-   -   Absorption and marginal costing (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=675435)

  • Jun 26, 2012, 08:17 AM
    MissyNeha014
    absorption and marginal costing
    We have the following questions of which my friend and I are getting different answers in regards to the profit earned under the two techniques. Can you please help and please show all the working and steps involved. Please show the income statements under both techniques.

    The following data relate to XYZ company which makes and sells computers.

    Production 1,00,000 units
    Sales 80,000 units
    Selling price/unit Rs.15
    Direct materials Rs. 2,50,000
    Direct labour Rs. 3,00,000
    Factory overheads:
    Variable Rs. 1,00,000
    Fixed Rs. 2,50,000
    Selling and Distribution overheads:
    Variable Rs. 1,00,000
    Fixed Rs. 2,00,000

    You are required to present income statements using (a) absorption costing and (b) marginal costing. Find the profit earned in using the two different techniques.
  • Jun 26, 2012, 04:18 PM
    paraclete
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by MissyNeha014 View Post
    We have the following questions of which my friend and I are getting different answers in regards to the profit earned under the two techniques. Can you please help and please show all the working and steps involved. Please show the income statements under both techniques.

    The following data relate to XYZ company which makes and sells computers.

    Production 1,00,000 units
    Sales 80,000 units
    Selling price/unit Rs.15
    Direct materials Rs. 2,50,000
    Direct labour Rs. 3,00,000
    Factory overheads:
    Variable Rs. 1,00,000
    Fixed Rs. 2,50,000
    Selling and Distribution overheads:
    Variable Rs. 1,00,000
    Fixed Rs. 2,00,000

    You are required to present income statements using (a) absorption costing and (b) marginal costing. Find the profit earned in using the two different techniques.

    How about you present your work and we will comment
  • Jun 26, 2012, 09:25 PM
    MissyNeha014
    Sure no worries. Here are the income statements that I have prepared:

    (a) Under absorption costing

    Direct material 2,50,000
    Direct labour 3,00,000
    Variable overheads 2,00,000
    Total marginal cost 7,50,000
    Add: Fixed overheads 4,50,000
    Total cost of production 12,00,000
    Less: Closing stock 2,40,000
    Cost of goods sold 9,60,000
    Profit (bal fig) 2,40,000
    Sales 12,00,000

    Hence in part (a) my profit is 2,40,000

    (b) Under marginal costing

    Direct material 2,50,000
    Direct labour 3,00,000
    Variable overheads 2,00,000
    Total marginal cost 7,50,000
    Less: Closing stock 1,50,000
    Cost of goods sold 6,00,000
    Contribution 6,00,000
    Sales 12,00,000

    Profit = Contribution - Fixed cost
    Profit = 6,00,000 - 4,50,000
    Profit = 1,50,000

    Hence in part (b) my profit is 1,50,000
  • Jun 27, 2012, 03:43 AM
    paraclete
    It would be helpful if you would leave the , out, the. Out then we could read the figures
  • Jun 27, 2012, 03:56 AM
    MissyNeha014
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by paraclete View Post
    it would be helpful if you would leave the , out, the. out then we could read the figures

    Better?

    (a) Under absorption costing

    Direct material 250000
    Direct labour 300000
    Variable overheads 200000
    Total marginal cost 750000
    Add: Fixed overheads 450000
    Total cost of production 1200000
    Less: Closing stock 240000
    Cost of goods sold 960000
    Profit (bal fig) 240000
    Sales 1200000

    Hence in part (a) my profit is 240000

    (b) Under marginal costing

    Direct material 250000
    Direct labour 300000
    Variable overheads 200000
    Total marginal cost 750000
    Less: Closing stock 150000
    Cost of goods sold 600000
    Contribution 600000
    Sales 1200000

    Profit = Contribution - Fixed cost
    Profit = 600000 - 450000
    Profit = 150000

    Hence in part (b) my profit is 150000
  • Jun 27, 2012, 06:41 AM
    paraclete
    Looks like you have answered the problem but what happened to the selling costs these are not part of the manufacturing cost

    I find the part a profit to be 180000 and the part b to be 130000
  • Jun 27, 2012, 08:11 AM
    MissyNeha014
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by paraclete View Post
    looks like you have answered the problem but what happened to the selling costs these are not part of the manufacturing cost

    i find the part a profit to be 180000 and the part b to be 130000

    which costs would those be?
    I have included the direct costs as can be seen
    the factory overheads and selling and dist overheads have been included as per their classification of variable and fixed costs

    I'm not sure which costs I'm missing? Please explain further.
  • Jun 27, 2012, 04:42 PM
    paraclete
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by MissyNeha014 View Post
    which costs would those be?
    i have included the direct costs as can be seen
    the factory overheads and selling and dist overheads have been included as per their classification of variable and fixed costs

    im not sure which costs im missing? please explain futher.

    Whether selling costs are fixed or variable they are not included in manufacturing costs in either method. The difference in the methodologies lies in the inclusion of fixed manufacturing overheads in product cost and thus inventory valuation. The absorption method carries some of these costs forward in inventory, the direct method does not, thus you get a different profit result.

    the only point of determining whether selling costs are fixed or variable is to measure the impact on profit of changes in volume, this you were not asked to do.
  • Jun 27, 2012, 05:24 PM
    MissyNeha014
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by paraclete View Post
    Whether selling costs are fixed or variable they are not included in manufacturing costs in either method. The difference in the methodologies lies in the inclusion of fixed manufacturing overheads in product cost and thus inventory valuation. The absorption method carries some of these costs forward in inventory, the direct method does not, thus you get a different profit result.

    the only point of determining whether selling costs are fixed or variable is to measure the impact on profit of changes in volume, this you were not asked to do.

    Assuming that no other costs are involved other than the figures provided, what would the profit amoumt to?
  • Jun 28, 2012, 03:17 AM
    paraclete
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by MissyNeha014 View Post
    Assuming that no other costs are involved other than the figures provided, what would the profit amoumt to?

    I answered that earlier
    Quote:

    I find the part a profit to be 180000 and the part b to be 130000

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:37 AM.