Originally Posted by
ScottGem
Its funny, but if they had just told the truth you would be in big trouble. The truth is you agreed to buy the house using money they provided to you with the promise that they would be able to buy it from you at a profit to you after a time. That is very different from what you said in your initial post. If they had gone to the judge with proof of the $2500 they paid, the judge would have possibly have ruled that there is a lease/purchase agreement. However they were out of line in asking to be put on the deed. And then forging a document ours their credibility in the crapper.
So yes, go ahead with the eviction. Tell the court that you did have a verbal lease/purchase but they had no right to ask to be put on the deed (they should have just put the lease/purchase agreement in writing) and by stopping payment have defaulted on the agreement which reverts it to rental lease which they have not paid on ans therefore, should be evicted so you can get a paying tenant.