DrBill100 - EtG really so overhyped? Now baffled: lab says 3 drinks=20-24hrs. EtG?
Dr.Bill, I have been researching both the validity and dangers of false positives and negatives of this test as it is used for criminal, employment, and child custody reasons. In addition to the variant cut-offs, incidental exposures, etc. I am flabbergasted by the amount of conflicting info out there - claims AND disclaimers by labs, in addition to the limited research despite the seeming "trust". So my questions:
I have read research that 1 drink - GENERALIZED - can be detected about 21 hours; 3 all the way to 5 (huge difference!) drinks just (avg.) 48?hrs. And that all at only measure at 100ng/ml cutoff. Nothing at 500 cut-off... or more importantly, correlated to actual urine levels detected vs. time and cut-offs...
Similarly, I have read lab disclaimers of like, 3 drinks to 40 or so hours. Finally, I just read the following of a Forensic Testing Services Site:
"The EtG test has become known as the “80 hour test” for detecting any amount of consumed ethyl alcohol. This is not totally true. The presence of EtG in urine is a definitive indicator that alcohol was ingested. It is true that EtG can be detected in chronic drinkers for 80 hours or even up to 5 days. During this period of chronic use, the EtG level can exceed 100,000 ng/mL. Two primary factors to determine the window of detection is based on volume of alcohol consumed and the time between each drink. A person that consumes 3 drinks can only have a detectable level of EtG for approximately 20 to 24 hours and peaks at approximately 9 hours with an EtG level around 15,000 ng/mL."
Interesting, but accurate? Is there an "average" you can extrapolate for EtG per drink, despite variations in individual? I know you've scrutinized much of the info out there, what do you think? Would this be equivalent of say 3-5 drinks, 500 cutoff, 48 hours on average? Or some ridiculous admission - or omission - or reality? (I think this is a direct-to-customer communication, not to "drinker"... )
Thanks!