Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Other Law (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=190)
-   -   Judgments and public record (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=599458)

  • Sep 28, 2011, 03:46 PM
    rlrl2010
    Judgments and public record
    Way back when I used to listen to the radio lawyer Bernard Meltzer(aka "Uncle Bernard" RIP) I remembered him telling some callers who wanted to sue their employer not to do it because a future employer could always find out about it and it might make them look "sue crazy"

    Is every party whether it be a defendant of plaintiff part of the public record when there is a judgment or is it only the defendant who is in the record when they are hit with a judgment? Or is the plaintiff who wins part of the public record too?
  • Sep 28, 2011, 03:52 PM
    ScottGem
    Both parties in a lawsuit become part of the public record of that suit.
  • Sep 28, 2011, 03:56 PM
    Fr_Chuck
    Both are part of the public record. Plus the employer may merely tell them that the employee sued them.
  • Sep 28, 2011, 04:51 PM
    AK lawyer
    Not only are the names of all parties to a lawsuit (plaintiffs and defendants) public record, but it's not merely the judgment (the ultimate conclusion of the suit), but all papers filed in the case (unless sealed). So, depending on how deep one wants to dig into the public record, almost every aspect of every lawsuit filed in this country is public record and available, in theory.

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Fr_Chuck View Post
    ... Plus the employer may merely tell them that the employee sued them.

    If you are suggesting that any employer sued by an employee is subject to some sort of a gag rule, you are incorrect.
  • Sep 29, 2011, 07:22 AM
    kcomissiong
    Quote:

    If you are suggesting that any employer sued by an employee is subject to some sort of a gag rule, you are incorrect.
    I think what he was saying is that they wouldn't have to go as far a public records check. The former employer could just tell them during a reference check.
  • Oct 1, 2011, 11:45 AM
    rlrl2010
    Well to shift the topic a little bit, if an employer loses and the plaintiff(employee) wins, technically the employer was in the wrong, so what do you think about the plaintiff being "sue crazy" in the eyes of a prospective employer who has checked public records?
  • Oct 1, 2011, 03:50 PM
    twinkiedooter
    Not necessarily. Each lawsuit is different but if the plaintiff has filed and won many such lawsuits in the past, then quite frankly that person would be deemed lawsuit happy and not a good risk as a potential employee.
  • Oct 1, 2011, 04:12 PM
    ScottGem
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by rlrl2010 View Post
    well to shift the topic a little bit, if an employer loses and the plaintiff(employee) wins, technically the employer was in the wrong, so what do you think about the plaintiff being "sue crazy" in the eyes of a prospective employer who has checked public records?

    To be "sue crazy" one would have to have several lawsuits. Even then, if the suits could be justified it may not matter.

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:01 PM.