Police arrested an innocent man because of long criminal history.
Before I ask my question please read what situation that had happened to give you a better idea of what's going on. There was an incident that had occurred @ my resident. There was a snowmobile that was cruising in my backyard and someone called the police. The police arrived and asked me if it was my boyfriend and I said "no". Now my boyfriend has a long criminal past and he's on conditions right now not to asscociate with me until the conditions are revoked. Now having said that the police assumed it was my boyfriend there @ my house with a stolen skidoo and it wasn't. I was standing outside on my step when the cops came and the person on the skidoo drove right between them & fled. They said it was my boyfriend and wanted a statement from me. I said "no". The officer started to swear @ me stating that I'm lying and trying 2 protect him and therefore they said they will arrest me. They left eventually and then I got a call stating from one of his friends that my boyfriend was arrested for a stolen skidoo, 2 breach of probation theft under $5000 and an abstruct of police officer and dangerous driving. His friend stated to me that my boyfriend was @ the house all night and he had broken his wrist from falling that day and hadn't sought medical help because he couldn't find a ride to the hospital. The police arrived @ the house and arrested my boyfriend and he told them that his wrist might be broken and needs medical help. The officer stated if he was to admit to the crimes then they will take him to the hospital. He then lied and said he did all those crimes just 2 seek medical help. While in the hospital he had surgery on his wrist and had pins put in it because it was broken. There were 2 guards having 2 watch over him for 4 days and one of the guards assaulted my boyfriend in there. It was reported to the nurses and documented. My question to you is he is pleading "not guilty" and I was wondering seeing that he admitted to doing something he didn't do, can he still be convicted? There is no evidence or statements of anything, so it's just their word against ours. Please let me know what you think.:(