Can anybody explain the case Peckam v Moore??

A former footballer took proceedings seeking compensation for an injury that occurred at training. His initial proceedings were taken against the football club, which was an unincorporated body, however, the court found that the club had no legal identity. The player reformulated his proceedings and took action against the individuals of the committee with whom he had contracted three years before the injury took place. As in many organisations, this committee had changed and a new committee was in place. The court eventually decided that the player should seek compensation through the committee that was in office at the time of injury.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jupiter

Can anybody explain the case Peckam v Moore????????

---

This is the second time you've posted asking for an explanation of a case -

Homework? Law School? High School Civics Class?