Comment on Altenweg's post
My apologies for having offended you, but it was ME to whom I figured that vet's comment would be directed , possibly only to himself. I haven't seen anyone on site here make any suggestions to counter any doctor's advice. But it really would upset either a Vet or an MD to find it out.
What do you think the vets who hear that their client is following the directions they got from the internet think? I know, because I've been there. But I have also been on this side before and realized even before being here that this sort of information site does a service that many vets don't fully realize. I know many vets who would say that very phrase in the past, but maybe not so many now. And NONE of them want to be overruled by any well intentioned stranger, regardless of where they may have come from, even if it may be sound advice.
Again, my apologies for offending. Pax?
Comment on Wondergirl's post
And what did your GP say about his/her opinion of the information put out by all the internet sites, not just the reputable ones?
There are several reputable Human medical sites, possibly more, but the Veterinary side suffers by comparison. There are a few, most of which are products of veterinary associations or hospitals who, by the way, advertise their existence very little. Problem... just how do you evaluate whether a different site is reputable?
One such unnamed site simply says 'Ask your question, get several answers and choose the one that seems right.' People participating in these medically oriented sites want, primarily, to know if their problem (human or animal) is serious enough to seek a doctor's help, and if not, what can they do about it. That seems easy enough, but still entails making some sort of diagnosis before answering. How many wrong answers wind up in the vet's office? And what is the vet's response?