Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Other Law (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=190)
-   -   Named drivers son was driving car when should not have been am I liable (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=554374)

  • Feb 14, 2011, 11:42 AM
    hegster
    Named drivers son was driving car when should not have been am I liable
    He did not even have a license
  • Feb 14, 2011, 11:43 AM
    smoothy

    Yes... the owner of the car is legally and financially responsible PARTICULARLY when they allow an unlicensed driver to use it. And worse... might increase your liability depending on the terms of your insurance policy.
  • Feb 14, 2011, 11:51 AM
    JudyKayTee

    Well, I'm somewhat going to disagree with my friend, Smoothy.

    Responsible/liable for what? The fact that a driver is unlicensed does NOT mean that the driver is responsible for an accident.

    Many people don't know the difference between "responsible" and "liable."

    What are the circumstances?
  • Feb 14, 2011, 11:59 AM
    smoothy
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by JudyKayTee View Post
    Well, I'm somewhat going to disagree with my friend, Smoothy.

    Responsible/liable for what? The fact that a driver is unlicensed does NOT mean that the driver is responsible for an accident.

    Many people don't know the difference between "responsible" and "liable."

    What are the circumstances?

    I was using them interchangibly... but yes... they can mean very different things, particularly in court. Liable... would have been a much better choice of word for me to have used. I oversimplified it...
  • Feb 14, 2011, 12:10 PM
    oneexception
    I think you are both right. However, like Judy said, it would depend on the circumstances. There are A lot of blanks to fill in here. Was there an accident? Was he pulled over and issued citations? Or was there even an incident at all? Is this all hypothetical?
  • Feb 14, 2011, 12:15 PM
    JudyKayTee
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by oneexception View Post
    I think you are both right. However, like Judy said, it would depend on the circumstances. There are ALOT of blanks to fill in here. Was there an accident? Was he pulled over and issued citations? Or was there even an incident at all? Is this all hypothetical?


    The owner of the car would not be "liable" for traffic citations under any circumstance - that's a whole different story.
  • Feb 14, 2011, 01:09 PM
    oneexception
    Quote:

    The owner of the car would not be "liable" for traffic citations under any circumstance - that's a whole different story.
    You are right, I'm only trying to make a point that there is a lot of info missing here.

    Im not saying they would be "liable" for any of his citations by any means.

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:01 PM.