Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Math & Sciences (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=402)
-   -   Epsilon delta limit question (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=530956)

  • Dec 2, 2010, 10:04 AM
    atf10359
    Epsilon delta limit question
    So the problem is to prove lim┬(x→3)⁡〖(x+1)/(x-1)〗=2 (sorry if it looks weird, I copy and pasted it from Word)
    I'm pretty sure I'm supposed to use the epsilon delta definition of limits to prove it. Our book doesn't tell us how to do that, but our teacher expects us to know it, so I looked it up online.
    I set it up like this: For all ε>0, there is a δ>0 such that if |x-3|<δ, then |(x+1)/(x-1)-2|<ε.
    Then I manipulated the |(x+1)/(x-1)-2|<ε to eventually get |(x-3)/(x-1)|<ε, which seems like it's on the right track to defining δ since |x-3|<δ. But if I use it like that then I get |x-3|<|x-1|ε, which would mean I would have to make δ=|x-1|ε and I'm pretty sure I'm not supposed to have x in the definition for δ.
    I just need some help figuring out what I'm supposed to do to get rid of that |x-1| so I can define δ. I think once I define δ I can do the rest of the problem just fine, I'm just having trouble getting there.
  • Dec 2, 2010, 10:09 AM
    atf10359
    sorry guys it came out looking really weird.
    lim(x->3) (x+1)/(x-1) =2
    ε is supposed to be epsilon
    δ is supposed to be delta
  • Dec 2, 2010, 10:10 AM
    atf10359
    Comment on atf10359's post
    Oh my goodness. AZA is the I with the hat.
  • Dec 2, 2010, 12:48 PM
    ebaines

    Perhaps you mean this? Show that



    you need to find such that if

    then


    for any positive .

    Is that it?
  • Dec 2, 2010, 09:20 PM
    atf10359
    Comment on ebaines's post
    Yes that's it, thanks for making it look better
  • Dec 3, 2010, 07:29 AM
    ebaines

    I would do this a bit differently. Starting with Galactus's observation that for this problem |f(x)-L| = |(x-3)/(x-1)|, set:



    We need to replace x with and solve for positive values of . This will show us that no matter what value of is chosen, we can find a that satisfies the required condition.



    Set x = 3:


    Note that both numerator and denominator are positive values (as long as isn't too big), so we can drop the absolute value signs and solve for :



    Now you can pick any positive value for , no matter how small, and show that if x is within of 3, the value of f(x) is within of 2. So for example if is picked to be 0.1, then satisfies the condition. Hence

  • Dec 3, 2010, 07:35 AM
    galactus
    1 Attachment(s)

    I tried giving you a rep, ebaines, but of course I have not spread it around enough :rolleyes:

    Anyway, what I was trying to say is that your method is best. To the point and a good explanation of what is going on.

    But, here is a graphical representation that may help you envision it.
  • Dec 4, 2010, 08:51 AM
    galactus

    Here is a epsilon delta applet that is very nice. Check it out.

    Sample Configurable JCM Applet: EpsilonDelta

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:59 PM.