Timeline:

• Jerry Brown campaign worker calls Meg Whitman a whore.
• NOW endorses Jerry Brown.
• NOW backtracks after backlash
• NOW calls Whitman a whore

That's right, the head of California's National Organization for (certain) Women has endorsed not only hate speech, but hate speech against women.

Quote:

---

California NOW President Patty Bellasalma told Talking Points Memo in an interview Thursday that "Meg Whitman could be described as 'a political whore.' Yes, that's an accurate statement."

---

Now that's the problem with the left, they self-righteously proclaim to be the champion of the little guy, blacks, women and whatever other disaffected group of the day - but in practice they only fight for the 'authentic' remnants of that group.

• Condi Rice - not an authentic black
• Colin Powell - 15 minutes of authenticity
• Marco Rubio - not an authentic Hispanic
• Meg Whitman - not an authentic woman
• Christine O'Donnell - not an authentic woman
• Sharron Angle - not an authentic woman
• Nikki Haley - not an authentic Indian-American woman

I'm sure Allen West is a traitor to his race as well.

NOW also endorsed Alan "Scum of the earth" Grayson, who called Linda Robertson, an adviser to Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, a “K Street whore," and in a year when record numbers of Republican women are running and doing well, USA Today's Susan Page says this could be "the Year of the Setback" for women.

It might have been another good year for women and minorities if it weren't for all those whores and traitors.

As a man I respect women I can't understand why you have such a vision of women but in your case its not just women but men are not angels either we as humans all have faults & when one becomes his/her own self critic we stop pointing fingers at others be it man or woman, in simple words it often takes two to create a problem - now ask yourself why you think its just women to blame or just men to blame..

Some women are indeed whores. Some men are whores too.

Hello Steve:

Yeah, people shouldn't throw around names like, whore, socialist, Nazi, illegal president, secret Muslim, Scum of the Earth...

But, they do... I don't know why. We should be nicer to each other.

excon

They have no clue to the toxicity they create. Just look at who they are endorsing. Its all part of the playbook. If they actually stood for women's rights then they would have to draw lines as they do. Instead they would rather be a cancer to the country then to advance a agenda that at one time needed a great amount of looking after. Since they can't afford to lose their financial base they just follow the party line.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by excon

Hello Steve:

Yeah, people shouldn't throw around names like, whore, socialist, Nazi, illegal president, secret Muslim, Scum of the Earth...

But, they do.... I dunno why. We should be nicer to each other.

excon

---

LOL! Greenie for you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by califdadof3

They have no clue to the toxicity they create. Just look at who they are endorsing. Its all part of the playbook. If they actually stood for womens rights then they would have to draw lines as they do. Instead they would rather be a cancer to the country then to advance a agenda that at one time needed a great amount of looking after. Since they can't afford to lose thier financial base they just follow the party line.

---

Hello again, dad:

I agree wholeheartedly... They suck...

excon

In life we know good & bad will always be - but the good people will always win this is due to the reason for being a good person but as many think that the bad only understand force or other only allows the bad to win sympathy by those less educated in life.

As for men & women of whatever race etc are part of good & bad so by calling them names or other doesn't change them or does it so we should use the approach that will help change a bad person...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mindwaves

In life we know good & bad will always be - but the good people will always win this is due to the reason for being a good person but as many think that the bad only understand force or other only allows the bad to win sympathy by those less educated in life.

As for men & women of whatever race etc are part of good & bad so by calling them names or other doesnt change them or does it so we should use the approach that will help change a bad person...

---

I hate to disagree but there is actually 3 types. Good bad and just plain evil. Its up to the person to determine which one your dealing with. And in politics it seems evil is making headway inside the spectrum.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mindwaves

As a man I respect women I can't understand why you have such a vision of women but in your case its not just women but men are not angels either we as humans all have faults & when one becomes his/her own self critic we stop pointing fingers at others be it man or woman, in simple words it often takes two to create a problem - now ask yourself why you think its just women to blame or just men to blame...?

---

That was one long run-on sentence I still don't understand, so I'll says it's liberals to blame.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by excon

Yeah, people shouldn't throw around names like, whore, socialist, Nazi, illegal president, secret Muslim, Scum of the Earth...

But, they do.... I dunno why. We should be nicer to each other.

---

We should, especially those who live in glass houses.

Plain evil people I do not class as part of human race as for good & bad people is what makes up this world, what really gets me is people who show simpathy to plain evil people & for that they win support & simpathy from those that are less educated.

The problem is we in the western world need to understand that evil people be they in politics or other use the less educated to win support & to prevent this support is to use an approach that does not involve calling of names or isolating such people as such people then can change it is isolation in my view that forces them to turn to those like them?

Even evil people must have a good side to them well every human does so surely they can be changed well that's my view but I do believe it's the isollation that prevents from changing we need to use an approach to help change them again be it politics or other.

Calling names or distancing them away only makes them believe they were right which is what & how they win simpathy & support we must not let that happen which is why we need to use a softer approach if we need to change such people.

Evil people can't win without simpathy & support & we in the western world oftern help win them simpathy & support by using names - you try calling just any good/ bad person names & the next thing he/she will do is to give you a BAD NAME so can you understand my view of how evil people win support?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mindwaves

Plain evil people I do not class as part of human race as for good & bad people is what makes up this world, what really gets me is people who show simpathy to plain evil people & for that they win support & simpathy from those that are less educated.

The problem is we in the western world need to understand that evil people be they in politics or other use the less educated to win support & to prevent this support is to use an approach that does not involve calling of names or isolating such people as such people then can change it is isolation in my view that forces them to turn to those like them?

Even evil people must have a good side to them well every human does so surely they can be changed well thats my view but I do believe its the isollation that prevents from changing we need to use an approach to help change them again be it politics or other.

Calling names or distancing them away only makes them believe they were right which is what & how they win simpathy & support we must not let that happen which is why we need to use a softer approach if we need to change such people.

Evil people can't win without simpathy & support & we in the western world oftern help win them simpathy & support by using names - you try calling just any good/ bad person names & the next thing he/she will do is to give you a BAD NAME so can you understand my view of how evil people win support?

---

I understand how they gain support. The problem is that they also have to be recognised for who and what they are. That way you can deal with them at the appropriate level. How can you fight an enemy that you don't understand? You cant. It's that simple.

I fully agree with you on that even take for example muslims who are good peace loving have that difficulty even in a country where such evil people have no care for who they harm so your not on your own - a plain evil person has no care for anyone!

We all share the same pain & worry as evil knows no love or care - what hurts most is less educated fall into the trap through simpathy & support? Do they not think twice that these people are those who are using them as their strength? Do not see or hear that these people target anyone & everyone so why do they simpathise with them?

These people are trully one of a kind - PLAIN CARELESS EVIL the question is how to know so in my view it's the worst approach to make is to do their work for them which is show them simpathy? Those who preach hate in my view are signs of these careless FOR ANYONE plain evil people which makes them enemy of human race.

Such people were well known to be in afghanistan but now moved into pakistan just like a house which has rats but bring a cat in & the rats move next door I rest my case on such people that I think have no selection but are plain enemy of entire human race - they are reconised through preaching hate!

Shows that NOW isn't really an organisation meant to help women... its to support their Messiah and the political agenda of the extreme left.

Shame... but not surprising.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smoothy

Shows that NOW isn't really an organisation meant to help women....its to support their Messiah and the political agenda of the extreme left.

---

I believe when you say "messiah" you are referring to President Obama. N.O.W. has been active since 1966.

a) why do you have a religious reverence for Obama?
b) N.O.W. has been active since 1966, was it's plan all along to wait for your messiah?

You fail logically, perhaps it's your dependence on religion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NeedKarma

I believe when you say "messiah" you are referring to President Obama. N.O.W. has been active since 1966.

a) why do you have a religious reverence for Obama?
b) N.O.W. has been active since 1966, was it's plan all along to wait for your messiah?

You fail logically, perhaps it's your dependence on religion.

---

Oh trust me... Its sarcasm... I think the man is a two bit con man that got himself in WAY over his head. I have NO personal political or religious reverence for Obama in any way, shape or form.

Yeah I know NOW has been around for a very long time... but they have always held a radical left wing stance. I'm not saying their basic premise for existing never had merit... I'm only stating they were hijacked by people with other political agendas than their root cause for existence.

Their actions show that their extreme left wing Ideology is more important than the women they are supposed to be advocating. Or their support of women and women's issues would be non-partisan.

On NOW's original purpose:

Quote:

---

Analoyce Clapp wrote, "28 women met to set up a temporary organization for this purpose: To take action to bring women into full participation in the mainstream of American society now, assuming all the privileges and responsibilities thereof in truly equal partnership with men."

---

Meg Whitman is the epitome of success according to their founding vision. A successful CEO of a major corporation running for the highest office in the state of California. For NOW to call her a whore is damned hypocritical and they ought to be ashamed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

For NOW to call her a whore is damned hypocritical and they ought to be ashamed.

---

I agree.