Tea Party continues to shock conventional wisdom
In NY a tea party candidate Carl Paladino whupped perenial GOP loser (and favorite sacrificial lamb offered up by the lame party machine) Rick Lazio.
What has everyone shook up in both parties however was the results of the Delaware primary, where long time GOP(from the RINO wing) operative Mike Castle got trounced by TP Express candidate Christine O'Donnell. In this case the national GOP went on the attack whipping up the punditry class (even some FOX pundits ) and the machine to do anything possible to stop this "unelectable" candidate.
The Guardian prognosticators are stupified . (their article focuses on masturbation so it is too stupid to take seriously)
Christine O'Donnell brings unlikely Tea Party triumph to Delaware | World news | guardian.co.uk
And the Compost sees the silver lining in this apparent foot shooting exercise by the GOP voters.
Quote:
Castle was the heavy favorite to win in November and take the seat Biden held for three decades before he resigned to become President Obama's vice president. Polls showed Castle leading Democrat Chris Coons, the New Castle County executive, and many Democrats considered the seat virtually gone.
Now those calculations are out the window, as exuberant Democrats predicted they would hold the seat and the GOP establishment in Washington weighed whether to shift its resources to other more attractive contests. A senior Republican, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to offer a candid view, said the national committee would “walk” out of the Delaware race.
washingtonpost.com
The conventional wisdom was clearly wrong despite a determined effort to make it a self fulfilling prophesy . Why should we believe conventional wisdom now ?
I find it comical anyway that the GOP thinks that Castle was so important to them. The guy has a recent history of crossing the aisle and voting for the seminal issues the Democrats champion. Do they really think adding another Collins ,Snowe job ,or Scott Brown will help them accomplish their policy goals ?
But the question remains... Why should I believe the punditry on both sides who say O'Donnell is unelectable when they have underestimated the Tea Party all year ?