misdemeanor probation violation one was dismissed I was released 6/10 /10
I violated for a random drug screen by admitting I wouldn't pass probby didn't make me pee but had to sign waiver, he felt bad I was falling apart I'm on felony agg. Battery charges brought to simple battery on probation for a year, its been 5-6 months now he say he's sending techanical violations to judge asking that I b released to him to go to counseling and if the judge oks it I Don't GO TO JAIL @ all, is this true?? I nviolated exactly a week from today 7th, he said it takes @ least two weeks for answer, is this enough info for a detalied answer?

No one here knows - if that's what the PO said, that's what I would believe.

Yes, that's enough details (and no one but you ever posts all the details). It's just impossible to say and I would believe the PO unless you have some reason not to believe him.

If counselling doesn't work, of course, and you do violate again you most definitely will go to jail.

It literally makes me sick how all of these people who are already on probation can get online and try to find another way to take advantage of our Justice System again. I feel that every state in the U.S should have the 3 strikes and you are out laws. See it time and time again, those going in for violating the laws of the land, get a slap on the wrist and go right back out and do it again. Jail Over-crowding Not An Acceptable Excuse to me to let them out or off. They are out to beat our system at taxpaper's expense any way they can. HOPE YOU ALL GET WHAT IS DUE YOU!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kitbit44

It literally makes me sick how all of these people who are already on probation can get online and try to find another way to take advantage of our Justice System again. I feel that every state in the U.S should have the 3 strikes and you are out laws. See it time and time again, those going in for violating the laws of the land, get a slap on the wrist and go right back out and do it again. Jail Over-crowding Not An Acceptable Excuse to me to let them out or off. They are out to beat our system at taxpaper's expense any way they can. HOPE YOU ALL GET WHAT IS DUE YOU!!!

---

Another one hit wonder - joins, has nothing to say but this, poof - gone.

Even if we don't like it or agree with it...

The law is the law. This particular section deals with law.

Not your opinion, my opinion, or anyone's opinion.
Matters here.
Only statutes, codes, laws, and rules.

How we feel about it or how it affects us is covered elsewhere.

Only the facts matter here.

The issue is did they tell you that to get you to confess ? They are allowed to lie to get you to sign a confession.

Was it a deal worked out with your attorney ? Is it in writing, did he give you paper work saying that was what he was doing.

The PO can of course make a recommendation to the judge as to their opinion, and yes, they can recommend that you be released back on probation, that is common to happen.

The PO is just required to turn you in for violations but does not have to feel you need to be in prision.

And the PO can recommend they find the deepest hole in the worst prison and throw you in to it.

In either case the judge does not have to do what the PO wants, if the Judge had a fight with his wife, had bill collectors bothering him, and he is in a bad mood, he can do what he wants.

So it all depends on if they believe you will really do better this time, or if they think you are just playing the court system.

So you never speed , run a red light, download a song or movie free? Or are these not serious enough breeches of the law? Jails would not be overcrowded if non-violent offenders weren't taking up 60% of the space needed for criminals.

Just the facts mam. Thanks

Or the judge may be out of his oxycontin and grumpy until he gets his 'script filled.

I recevied a phone call a week and a half after I gave a u.a that I was positive for meth. I also tested three days later which was negative. I denied the results due to doing these test for two years and never having a positive result. I was never shown the sample that said it was positive I was told I had to pay $39.00 more dollars to have the sample I've never seeen to a lab. This doesn't sound right to me

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RWILSON 3266

This doesnt sound right to me

---

Hello R:

I'm sure it's not.. Do YOU trust the PO to do things RIGHT?? I surly don't... So, if you're not dirty, PAY the money for a new test to PROVE it...

excon