Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Other Law (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=190)
-   -   Judgment entered against defendant in 1998. Abstract of Judgment recorded 2001. (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=490514)

  • Jul 21, 2010, 12:15 PM
    neilyoung_at_heart_2
    Judgment entered against defendant in 1998. Abstract of Judgment recorded 2001.
    Judgment against defendant entered more than 10 years ago. Abstract recorded and 10 years have lapsed. Judgment not renewed as required by law. So, judgment is barred by Statute of Limitations.

    What action, if any, need be taken to remove the Abstract of Judgment from clouding title on real property?
  • Jul 21, 2010, 12:21 PM
    neilyoung_at_heart_2

    Code of Civil Procedure Section 697.310 governs the real property lien
    Created by an abstract of judgment. You can view it at
    CA Codes (ccp:697.310-697.410)
    It states, in pertinent part:
    "Unless the money judgment is satisfied or the judgment lien is
    released, subject to Section 683.180 (renewal of judgment), a
    judgment lien created under this section continues until 10 years
    from the date of entry of the judgment."

    And under Section 683.180, the only way to maintain your lien is by
    Recording a certified copy of the application for renewal of the
    Judgment. Otherwise the lien simply expires.
    "If a judgment lien on an interest in real property has
    been created pursuant to a money judgment and the judgment is
    renewed pursuant to this article, the duration of the judgment lien
    is extended until 10 years from the date of the filing of the
    application for renewal if, before the expiration of the judgment
    lien, a certified copy of the application for renewal is recorded
    with the county recorder of the county where the real property
    subject to the judgment lien is located."
    CA Codes (ccp:683.110-683.220)
    (you have to scroll down about 3/4 of the way down the page)
  • Jul 21, 2010, 05:21 PM
    twinkiedooter
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by neilyoung_at_heart_2 View Post
    Code of Civil Procedure Section 697.310 governs the real property lien
    created by an abstract of judgment. You can view it at
    CA Codes (ccp:697.310-697.410)
    It states, in pertinent part:
    "Unless the money judgment is satisfied or the judgment lien is
    released, subject to Section 683.180 (renewal of judgment), a
    judgment lien created under this section continues until 10 years
    from the date of entry of the judgment."

    And under Section 683.180, the only way to maintain your lien is by
    recording a certified copy of the application for renewal of the
    judgment. Otherwise the lien simply expires.
    "If a judgment lien on an interest in real property has
    been created pursuant to a money judgment and the judgment is
    renewed pursuant to this article, the duration of the judgment lien
    is extended until 10 years from the date of the filing of the
    application for renewal if, before the expiration of the judgment
    lien, a certified copy of the application for renewal is recorded
    with the county recorder of the county where the real property
    subject to the judgment lien is located."
    CA Codes (ccp:683.110-683.220)
    (you have to scroll down about 3/4 of the way down the page)


    So what is your point of coming on here, asking a question and then answering yourself? Is it to prove to someone that you are smart or something?

    I'm really baffled on this one guys.
  • Jul 21, 2010, 05:24 PM
    Fr_Chuck

    Well and if I understand or misunderstood, he asked about Tennessee and gave California code??
  • Jul 22, 2010, 10:13 AM
    neilyoung_at_heart_2

    Google Answers: Removing Recorded Judgment Lien in California after 10 years - Lawyers only

    Reveals the nuance.
  • Jul 22, 2010, 12:32 PM
    neilyoung_at_heart_2

    twinkiedooter:

    I know I am smart.

    This site is dangerous IMO.
  • Jul 23, 2010, 07:54 AM
    JudyKayTee

    What's with this guy? There's computer access at the institution?

    Ridiculous and time wasting - claims 40 years as an Attorney.

    Move to a discussion site or close or simply delete - all comes out the same.
  • Jul 23, 2010, 10:20 AM
    sideoutshu
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by JudyKayTee View Post
    What's with this guy? There's computer access at the institution?

    Ridiculous and time wasting - claims 40 years as an Attorney.

    Move to a discussion site or close or simply delete - all comes out the same.

    If he has 40+ years as an attorney, he probably isn't surfing the internet. The guys at my firm that age have to have secretaries open their email for them.
  • Jul 23, 2010, 10:29 AM
    LisaB4657
    If he has 40+ years of experience as an attorney then he would know that asking a title company what they would require in order to issue a policy insuring clear title would be the best answer to his question rather than mining the Code of Civil Procedure. That type of knowledge (knowing where to go to get the best answer to your question) is what comes with experience.

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:28 AM.