Originally Posted by
Kstar4u
Thank you for your comments JudyKayTee. You're right...I don't know if John was under the influence while he was driving for work or not. I'm not an expert in these matters but from the standpoint of what I perceive as fair: one "dirty" test with an otherwise "clean" driving record with no evidence of breaking any law(s) while working; no accident or damages related to driving under the influence and maybe severe results of any further positive tests (or even a suspension of driving priviledges for the first offense) would seem more productive. Our current unemployment rates are way too high to add more to the roles for what has apparently become socially accepatble (albeit illegal) behavior. I sure don't want to minimize the seriousness of the risks of DUI, though. I'm starting to think that our elected officials are getting "too personal". Here in California, there is legislation afoot to require safety seats for pets while in one's car.