My daughter had 8 cavities and crowns were recommended
I have taken my daughter to the dentist since she was 6 months old and every 6 months ever since. She how 4 years old and I took her last week and I was told that she had 8 cavities in the back molars. I was so shocked because 6 months ago everything looked great. The dentist told me that she needed 8 crowns. I couldn't believe it. I kept asking why the crowns and not just do the fillings but she said that the cavities were too close to the nerve and they didn't want to risk it. Now she has eight stainless steel crowns and I just can't get over the fact that they didn't just filled them. I feel so bad for her because I feel I should have research more and get a second opinion? DId I do the right thing? Were the crowns the right procedure? Could fillings have been sufficient? Please help?
They didn't show me the x-rays
Thank you for answering my question... and going back to what was said... The dentist didn't show me the x-rays. I was in the room when he was discussing the x-rays with his assistant and I didn't hear anything about extensive decay he just said my daughter needed crowns then I asked him why and he told me his assistant would explain everything. So, then he left and she (the assitant) told me that the cavities were too close to the nerve and that the dentist recommended crowns. I ask her why not just remove the cavities and fill them like they do with adults and she told me that the molar would stay too weak so the crowns would make them stronger and that way they wouldn't break. So, then she was given some medicine to make her relax and then her gums were sedated with inyections. Another dentist came in and she drilled and placed the 8 crowns. Now I feel I didn't do the right thing and I can't stop thinking about that. Can the crowns be removed? If there was no extensive decay was their resoning correct? Is there such thing as the molars being too weak after removing the cavities and then breaking? Please help!!
I call the dentis and asked
Thanks again for the responses... I really appreciate the input... and going back I call the office and asked if she had extensive decay for the crowns to be needed and they told me that the cavities were in between the teeth and that she had pulpotomies done and I told them that she never complained about any pain and they told me that they wanted to prevent that from happening that that's why they did it. They didn't want the child to get to the point and be in pain. Then, I asked how could the decay happen within six months and then be so extensive because last time they told her teeth looked great and that I was going a great job! She told me that she did have some cavities and apologized for them not mentioning anything and they had them on watch to see how they would progressed. They told me they would never do something that wasn't totally necessary for the child first because it's illegal and then because they just wouldn't... but I don't know... what do you all think?