Need Your Advise on For Family Member of EEA Citizen
Hello first of all thanks for everything this site provides.. :)
I am EEU Citizen married to Indian citizen who comes under third country citizen law of Sehgen visa.
We have our marriage registered in Hungary.we applied visa fro my husband to come and live in Hungary but we don't know yet why his visa was refused .The document which were advices from the consulate adviser Ms. Csilla Havasi-Szoták we submited accordingly. Now they came up with some reason stating some law what we have to follow. I called them back to know what did we lack and what comes under this law they said no idea .there we go with the law and bureaucracy.. thanks for the info I said.. now we are stuck as they told use file visa again but somebody tells how.. what did we lack we got everything from transportation, invitation ,back statement ,tax paper,marriage registration Certi- Hungarian.please tell us what documents are needed.I am sponsring his trip and my family is waiting for him to come... please help us we don't know which way to go.. shall I go back to india and apply his visa ?
The letter came it suggest something like this
Nanada rajeesh kumar india anyja neve sumitra nanda utlevel szama h 3995816,
Indiai allampolgar altal kerelmezett c (egt - caaladtagja ) tipusu latogato celu vizum kiadasat az
1990 junius 19-i schengeni vegrehajtasi egyezmeny (SVE) 15. Cikke , valaminta schengeni hatar-ellenorzesi kodex 562/2006/ek rendelet 5 cikke (1)
Bekezdesenek a b d e pontjaiban fglaltakra tekintettel elutasitom.
Az eljaras igazgatasi szolgaltatasi dijat az ugyfel viseli
E dontes ellen a harmadik orszagok allampolgarainak beutazasarol es tartozkodasarol szolo 2007.Evi 2. torveny (harmtv.) 9 & 8 bekezdese illetve a szabad mozgas es tartozkodas jogaval rendelkezo
Szemelyek beutazasarol es tartozkodasarol szolo 1007 evi 1 torveny 20 & (6) bekezdese ertelmeben allamigazgatasi uton jogorvoslatnak helye nincs
Amennyiben a dontes ellen panaszt kivan tenni ugy beadvanyaval a konszuli osztaly vezetojehez a kulkepviselet vezetojehez vagay a kulugyminiszteriumhoz fordulhat a panaszt az eljarasra jogosult szerv a 2004. Evi XXIX TV 141-143 $ aiban fglaltak szerint biralja el
A benyujtott vizumkerelem vizsgalata soran megallapitast nyert
A kerelmezo nem teljesitette a 2007 evi I torveny 4 and 1 bekezdeseben foglalt felteteleket.
A fent megallapitott tenyallasra tekintettel nanda rajeesh kumar reszere C latogato vizum nem adhato
A fentiekre tekintettel a tenyallasnak a kozigazgatasi hatosagi eljaras es szolgaltatas altalanos
A kozigazgatasi hastosagi eljaraeses szolgaltatas altalanos
Szavbakyairol szolo 2004 evi cxl torveny ( a tovabbiakban ket ) 50 &-ben foglaltaknak megfelelo
Tisztazasat kovtoen valamint 72 & (1) bekezdesnek megfeleloen a rendelkezo reszben foglaltak szerint htaromztam
As eljaras igazgatasi szolgaltatasi dijanak merteket a kulfoldiek beutazasaval es tartozkodasaval kapcsolatos eljarasok
Dijarol szolo 28/2007.v (v.31.)IRM rendelete melleklete alapjan allapitottam meg
Hatosagom hataskoret es illetekesseget a vhr. & and B pontja illetve a 8 and 1 bekezdese allapitja meg
Kesult 2 peldanyaban
With warm regards