Has anyone failed an EtG test after 80 hours?
Has anyone ever failed an ETG test after 80 hours? It says it can go back 80 hours 3-5 days, so let me rephrase this, has anyone failed an ETG test with more than 80 hours since there last drink?
Alcohol consumption and EtG testing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bambam06
SWIM made the mistake of drinking on a late tuesday night, and got the etg test the following monday. After doing a lot of research he freaked himself out because of the incdental exposure.......So my question, does he have anything to worry about? and if it fails what would the next course be? He currently is taking benedry and after doing research of ethanol products, realized it was in his deoderant, shampoo, mouth wash, bread....
As relates to the detection window for the alcohol consumed: There should be no EtG remaining.
As to incidental exposure: Anyone submitting to an EtG urinalysis should worry. Alcohol is ubiquitous in our environment and there is no research relating to cumulative exposure. Most research has focused on hand cleanser/sanitizers. It is believed that the majority of the detectable alcohol derives from inhalation rather than transdermal absorption. Of course any product containing alcohol (including food) ingested orally will definitely produce EtG.
EtG testing is unregulated. There is no agreement amongst testing laboratories or within the medical community as to a uniform cut-off level to prevent false positives. Yet, it is promoted as a scientific tool for detecting alcohol consumption. It fails to such end, providing inconsistent and unreliable results. It detects the metabolites of alcohol with astounding precision but cannot distinguish between incidental exposure or voluntary usage.
Numerous agencies have issued advisories in relation to EtG testing. (NIH;SAMHSA 2006, National Assoc. of Drug Court Professionals 2006, Greg Skipper, MD, 2005, [he introduced the system to the US]) The current view is as follows:
"Currently, the use of an EtG test in determining abstinence lacks sufficient proven specificity for use as primary or sole evidence that an individual prohibited from drinking, in a criminal justice or a regulatory compliance context, has truly been drinking. Legal or disciplinary action based solely on a positive EtG, or other test discussed in this Advisory, is inappropriate and scientifically unsupportable at this time. These tests should currently be considered as potential valuable clinical tools, but their use in forensic settings is premature." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
The problems are well known. Scientific criticisms abound. They continue to be ignored and use of the test is increasing.