I went to court yesterday because of an eviction notice and the judge ruled in favor of the plaintiff. I would not be going through this had the lender not gone forward with the sale while we were in the process of a modification. Not only that, it was later discovered that documents that had been recorded, have been altered and a Notary was notorizing docs when she was not certified. I attempted to request a continuance of trial, because of my findings, but the judge already had her mind made up.

Hello a:

It's confusing when you piggyback your question on top of somebody else's. I know, it's confusing for a newcomer. Maybe somebody will move it.

The only thing you can do is file an appeal and, if granted, another judge will have a look at it. You can't appeal a decision based on the facts. You can only appeal the process. In your case, since you HAD new evidence, and the judge didn't want to see it, you could say the judge abused her discretion.

excon

As excon said you should piggyback your post on someone else's thread so I moved it to it's own thread.

You need to provide more info here. Are you the tenant or the landlord? What sale are you referring to? Who was being evicted? Please try to make your question coherent so we can help.