Leave it to the Italians to find a tactic that works in Afghanistan. The Italians grease the palms of the Taliban commanders and what do you get; no dead Italians. Who would have though that such a simple tactic would succeed? No military genius needed there, perhaps that's the problem? Silvio should have been given the Nobel Peace prize for that one.

Well, one day the Italians moved out and the French moved in and being oblivious to the tactic the French got it in the neck. So Obama has the perfect strategy and it can be done without a troop surge or a bulge in the budget. If the Americans want to pacify the Taliban all they have to do is put them on the payroll. It's a lot cheaper than a military solution and who knows they may be able to be paid to do something useful. The tactic should be particularly apparent to Obama, considering where he comes from. If he implemented it he truly would be worthy of the Peace Prize, he could even use the prize to make the first down payment.

NATO troops 'paying for peace' | World Breaking News | News.com.au

I find it interesting that the Italians fell for the "protection racket"... pay up for protection from the local bosses or you get beat up by the local toughs. Isn't that the same tactic that organized crime uses in more civilized countries?

Do you support organized crime and the protection racket?

I guess you do.

Elliot

A disgrace. The French troops deserved better .
The world wonders why we like to go unilateral.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ETWolverine

I find it interesting that the Italians fell for the "protection racket"... pay up for protection from the local bosses or you get beat up by the local toughs. Isn't that the same tactic that organized crime uses in more civilized countries?

Do you support organized crime and the protection racket?

I guess you do.

Elliot

---

Look, that sort of thing is business as usual for the Italians, they understand it. You could say it is the family business and expected. The Taliban has some of the aspects of organised crime but is paying the Taliban to protect foreign troops or even Afghan citizens any different to having a standing army and a police force to do it? Morality takes strange twists in exotic places and cultures and it won't change just because you think it undesirable.

It may actually be the solution for Afghanistan, enlist the holy warriors as protectors of the people, For a few million dollars you could secure the whole country, and no doubt for a few more get rid of Al Qaeda once the deal is in place. Is it any different to offering rewards or paying informants?

To get a result in Afghanistan you have to think outside the square and come to grips with the thinking of the people. Conventional military strategy won't do it short of a massive army on the ground, a million men or more, and maybe not even then. A few thousand insurgents don't warrant such a response, but obviously their cause is easily overturned by financial incentives, so hire them as security guards, they are probably cheaper than american contractors and obviously more effective.

The americans are so dumb sometimes.

Quote:

---

It may actually be the solution for Afghanistan, enlist the holy warriors as protectors of the people,

---

Why not ? It worked so well for the Romans !

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomder55

A disgrace. The French troops deserved better .
The world wonders why we like to go unilateral.

---

Yes it pays to keep corruption under control

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomder55

Why not ? It worked so well for the Romans !

---

Uh, yeah, about that...

Didn't the Varangian Guard eventually end up dictating who would be the next emperor of Rome, and in a few cases arrange for "accidents" of a few of those emperors? The 'foreign warriors' who were enlisted to protect the realm ended up controlling the realm.

I'm not sure that we should call it a successful tactic after all.

Elliot

Yes that is exactly what I meant. I was waiting for someone to question the comment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ETWolverine

Uh, yeah, about that...

Didn't the Varangian Guard eventually end up dictating who would be the next emperor of Rome, and in a few cases arrange for "accidents" of a few of those emperors? The 'foreign warriors' who were enlisted to protect the realm ended up controling the realm.

I'm not sure that we should call it a successful tactic after all.

Elliot

---

I don't know It has worked fairly well for the US so far.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ETWolverine

I find it interesting that the Italians fell for the "protection racket"... pay up for protection from the local bosses or you get beat up by the local toughs. Isn't that the same tactic that organized crime uses in more civilized countries? Do you support organized crime and the protection racket?

I guess you do.

---

Hello Elliot:

Dude! I guess you didn't support the dufus when he did exactly the same thing in Al Anbar.

As a matter of fact, the reason the surge worked is because we used MONEY as a WEAPON in Al Anbar. Didn't you read about it... Here's a database of the payments. Interestingly, it includes WHO we made the payments too. Most were in Al Anbar Province. Whatdya know about that?

Money as a Weapon (washingtonpost.com)

excon

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by excon

Hello Elliot:

Dude! I guess you didn't support the dufus when he did exactly the same thing in Al Anbar.

As a matter of fact, the reason the surge worked is because we used MONEY as a WEAPON in Al Anbar. Didn't you read about it... Here's a database of the payments. Interestingly, it includes WHO we made the payments too. Most were in Al Anbar Province. Whatdya know about that??

Money as a Weapon (washingtonpost.com)

excon

---

Hey, ex, that's a list of condolence payments, a payoff for killing someone's kin there is even a payment of $10 demonstrating how much the US values life. No doubt they are doing the same in Afghanistan but they need to step up the war to get the money to the population