Dog food. Natural is better?
Maybe I will not get anything stirred up, but I need to talk about something that is on my mind.
When if comes to dog food, how is this necessarily true? I feed a pretty good food with no corn, wheat, soy, bi-products etc. And the reason why I do that is because... basically "the dog food website everyone keeps linking everyone too" (dont guess I should name names?? ) say its best. I have been to a website that picks out the bad ingredients in dog food and tells you what it really is. But I am not understanding why its so bad.
For example
Didn't dogs develop on our left overs. Our ansisters fed the early dogs basically things that they wouldn't eat. And they developed to live off that for thousands of years. And now, today we feed things like free range bison and blue berries! I just wonder what is actually more "natural" for a dog to be eating.
Also, I know that vets endorse things like like Science Diet, mainly because they sell it and it helps them make money. BUT science diets have vets who formulate the dog food. Does Wellness, or Innova? I cannot help but wonder if this natural dog food thing is a crazy or not. And what really is better... Purina Pro Plan, or Taste of the Wild!
I personally no longer care what "the dog food site everyone keeps linking me to" says. I have been looking long and hard and trying to do my research, and from what I am gathering its basically some guys opinion. He doesn't make dog food, hasn't went to school for it, it is just basically someone who picks out the yucky sounding ingredients and tells you what he has found that they are... which may be true, or may not. From what I gather he is no expert or a vet. (not that vets know squat about food)
Opinions are like butt holes!
But I honestly don't see me feeding my dogs animal digest, animal fat, meat and bone meal... EWWW
What do you all think?