I ve been sue again. Now, the plaintiff claim unjustified enrichment. Does anyone have an idea what is the purpose of this count?
![]() |
I ve been sue again. Now, the plaintiff claim unjustified enrichment. Does anyone have an idea what is the purpose of this count?
Are You ouside the US? If not I have no idea what you are talking about.
No, I am not outside us. Last year mr. Yet helped me with this cc sue. This is a new sue and one of the count is unjustified enrichment. Now, I would like to know if I just do exactly the same (notice of intent to defend) and wait or I have to ad something else because of this new count.
The basic purpose of restitution is to achieve fairness and prevent the unjust enrichment of a party. Restitution is used in contractual situations where one party has conferred a benefit on another party but cannot collect payment because the contract is defective or no contract exists. For instance, assume that a person builds a barn on the property of another person. Assume further that the structure is not erected pursuant to a contract or agreement and that the owner of the property on which the barn sits refuses to pay the builder for the barn. Despite the absence of a contract, a court can order the owner to pay the builder the cost of the labor and materials under the doctrine of restitution.
Can you please give us more info on the case as to why they claim they have a case.
They are suing me without validating the debt. This was established in spears vs. Brenan. I also requested them to answered if the debt was sold to another bank or junk debt buyer and for how much ( case : Arrow vs. Coppola) I just want to have an idea of what are they trying to do since their complaint has count I : Account established, count ii :money lent, and coun iii: Unjustified enrichment. I also asked them if that money was insured and if they received any payment ( arrow vs. Coppola) because if the bank did filed a claim for that money and received monies for it what they are trying to do is called rico and it is totally illegal.
Check out this web site:
Unjust enrichment: West's Encyclopedia of American Law (Full Article) from Answers.com
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:25 AM. |