Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Multimedia (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=215)
-   -   MP3 vs. . wav Files (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=35187)

  • Sep 26, 2006, 03:09 PM
    sumplace
    MP3 vs. . wav Files
    I am a Webservant for a large group. We're debating whether audio files should be posted as MP3s or .wav files.

    Is one better than the other? Is one larger? What about download times?

    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
  • Sep 27, 2006, 03:22 PM
    phillysteakandcheese
    MP3 files are typically a fraction of the size of WAV files and if you're paying for bandwidth on your site or just want smaller downloads, MP3 is the format you want.

    If the files are already very small (under 1MB or so anyways), it probably doesn't matter all that much. If the files are any larger though... MP3 is your winner.
  • Sep 28, 2006, 05:38 AM
    sumplace
    Phillysteakandcheese --

    Thanks! I get it now.

    sumplace
  • Sep 28, 2006, 06:42 AM
    Nez
    Of course,just to throw a spanner in the works,there is always Ogg Vorbis:


    http://www.vorbis.com/faq/#what


    Why use this method? As it says on the site:

    "Because Vorbis provides a high-quality format for you to listen to your music.
    For a given file size, Vorbis sounds better than MP3. This means:
    You can keep your music collection at about the same quality level, but it'll take up less space
    Or you can have your music collection take up about the same amount of space, but have it sound better.
    Vorbis already enjoys widespread player support and work is underway to play Vorbis files on portable hardware"

    Okey,Steve Jobs won't be sweating,but it is another alternative.
  • Jan 15, 2008, 08:37 AM
    mani_jeddah
    The truth is that mp3 files r larger then wav in the size

    But another truth is its better in quality n public demand
    Remaining is upon u...

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:11 PM.