Hello,
Anybody knows which one is better or safer? I already find a company to buy it but I have read negatives posts here about mono, so please help! :confused:
![]() |
Hello,
Anybody knows which one is better or safer? I already find a company to buy it but I have read negatives posts here about mono, so please help! :confused:
I don't like both of them but rather you to try hq instead of mono!!
Stay away from mono, as for HQ u can't use it long term at such a high dose, by 100% am guessing you just mix the powder with water and put it on your skin directly, hot water of course, the lady I get my hq powder from told me that but am like uhm, probably not, I don't know what I would end up looking like.
Seller, you just added the product "HQ 100%" on Your website M#$%#@#$#.Net
So, pardon the pun, you've answered your own question
(twice over)
:)
Both seem to be a recipe for disaster... use with caution whatever you decide..
music70 I think lighter is using hq so maybe if you ask her kindly she can hook you up... good luck
Lolll gre8t
music70 you should also listen to cutebeth advice
From reading other posts it seems to me that both are harmful. On wikipedia I read that it can be harmful to use over 2% hq but other people have gone over that. But 100% of either chemical will definitely harm your skin. I would use some kind of skin lightening lotion or soap instead.
Music for my the high hq works great and you get fast results I used hq 20% now I'm on arbitin cream
HQ meaning hydroquinone? Isn't it bad for you, where the skin gradually gets thick and dark?
This is true when abused and used at high concentrations for long periods. I have read people using Hq 4% along with treinoin (retin-a) and received nice natural looking lightening. It should never be used long term, I would say no more than 4-6 months, then switch to something else to avoid getting bad results. I have never used this, this is from observation.
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:24 AM. |