How do I Respond to Plaintiff Atty Objections to Request for Info
I am currently fighting Wells Fargo Financial Bank regarding a debt they say I owe. I acknowledge that some of the debt is mine, but no all. I appeared at the pre-trial and the plaintiffs attorney did not. The judge called the plaintiff attorney and conferenced them into the pre-trial conversation. I thought this was odd and wonder if I can use this in my defense (plaintiff attorney didn't even show up for pre-trial). Anyway, my question revolves around the action I took after pre-trial.
The day of pre-trial, I filed a Request for Production of Documents with the Plaintiff. I filed with the court (did the Notice of Service, etc.. ). Thirty days later the Plaintiff filed a Response to my request and basically objected to all of my requests. They cited attorney-client privilege, imposition of obligations in excess of those imposed by Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure, not having the requested info, and that my requests are overly broad, unduly burdensome, vague, etc...
At this point I'm not sure how to proceed. I'd like to try and force them to provide the information I've requested, but I am unsure how. I've read through the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure and have considered a Motion to Compel but given that the Plaintiffs attorney has responded my Request (and objected to everything I requested), I don't think it will fly.
Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks!