I am currently fighting Wells Fargo Financial Bank regarding a debt they say I owe. I acknowledge that some of the debt is mine, but no all. I appeared at the pre-trial and the plaintiffs attorney did not. The judge called the plaintiff attorney and conferenced them into the pre-trial conversation. I thought this was odd and wonder if I can use this in my defense (plaintiff attorney didn't even show up for pre-trial). Anyway, my question revolves around the action I took after pre-trial.

The day of pre-trial, I filed a Request for Production of Documents with the Plaintiff. I filed with the court (did the Notice of Service, etc.. ). Thirty days later the Plaintiff filed a Response to my request and basically objected to all of my requests. They cited attorney-client privilege, imposition of obligations in excess of those imposed by Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure, not having the requested info, and that my requests are overly broad, unduly burdensome, vague, etc...

At this point I'm not sure how to proceed. I'd like to try and force them to provide the information I've requested, but I am unsure how. I've read through the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure and have considered a Motion to Compel but given that the Plaintiffs attorney has responded my Request (and objected to everything I requested), I don't think it will fly.

Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks!

File Motion to Compel, stated you reasons they are need for you defense. The court will than force the Palintiff to comply. Don't back down, force them to comply.

Some Demand the Original contract you allegelly signed. NO contract than they have no claim.

Never admitt any debt whether you owe it or not. The fact is they have sued you so this is now a legal matter. The burden of proof is on them make them prove you owe them Money. Don't interject your personal feelings of right and wrong into this. Its not personal anymore its Legal