Charged for Normal Wear and Tear
I've lived in my apt. for almost a year. I was told that I would be charged for cleaning the carpet, even though I already told my landlord that I would clean them before I moved. My landlord said they had a company that they wanted to use, so that charge would come out of my security deposit. My carpet isn't damaged nor is it very dirty at all, and I'm told about the charge before I even move out, though there isn't any "damage", and if there were, they wouldn't know YET because they haven't done a final walk through. Is my landlord allowed to charge me for cleaning carpet by a company THEY prefer, even though I have already cleaned it? Besides burns, stains, etc, wouldn't cleaning a fairly clean carpet be considered normal wear and tear? I think it's silly to tell me you're going to charge me because you have a company YOU want to use, though it isn't necessary.