With the large variety of electric space heaters out there purporting to be the "best, and most efficient" such as the Eden Pure, and others, I cannot for the life of me see where one is better than another. Watts is watts, right? P=EXI every time? I don't think the power usage is more or less efficient from a 1500w $40.00 space heater using a standard resistance heating element OR the Eden Pure ones using the same wattage but using an infrared tube... (or something similar)... Anyone help me out here?
I would give you that a radiant heat one one might be more efficient that one using a fan, but only by the wattage of the motor...

Thanks very much

You are correct.

They are all about the same efficiency of 100%. The only way I know to go over 100% efficiency is with a Heat Pump and that's because its not making heat but just moving it (aka a transfer engine).

I agree...
Heat pumps are the only thing I can think of that give more than a dollars worth of heat for a dollars worth of electricity.
Problem is, advertisers bamboozle people into thinking otherwise.
Thanks for the answer, it reinforces my thinking.
Mike

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 45auto

Problem is, advertisers bamboozle people into thinking otherwise.

---

Yes, just open the Sunday paper's Parade section and you'll see a ridiculous add about Omish electric heaters. I agree the Omish have some things correct, but they really shouldn't hitch their wagon (no pun intended) to this nonsense.

Interestingly, my father-in-law is an electrician and my mother-in-law seems to think their electric space heat they just bought is saving them gobs of money. Even well educated people forget the laws of physics just cannot be broken.