Ok, so I was in my first accident ever. Ive only been driving for a year, so I'm a new driver. My record is clean, except for a few parking violations. So, last week I was driving my sisters car here in California, and ran over a rolled up rug on the road. It was dark at night and really had little time to react when I saw it. The outcome: pretty heavy damage to the vechile. It runs perfectly and drives straight, but a lot of parts are broken or bent out of shape. Anyway, it looks like repairs are going to be costly, maybe around $5000.
The bad thing is my sister did not have insurance on her car, as it expired a week before the accident. Basically, my insurance is going to cover for it.
So, my question is, is this likely to affect my insurance rates? I think that's a pretty obvious question, but what Im curious about is roughly how much would you think it would go up? Am I likely to see a huge increase?

Yes, if you are asking if the accident reported to your insurance will raise your rates.

Especially given your short time on the road, it could go up quite a bit, or could even be canceled.

Given the cost to repair a vehicle these days, even the smallest dent is over $1000.

Yeah I know, its crazy. I mean, I think its just pure bad luck. I consider myself a good driver and don't drive recklessly. I mean it happened on a huge freeway and you don't expect to see any huge objects on your lane, let alone it happened during the night.

I did do a little research on the internet, and read that if you're a new driver, you already have a premium stuck on your policy for being inexperienced. I heard that this would lessen the likeliness or amount of an increase of your rates, since your already considered inexperienced. Does anyone think this could be true?

If it is well documented, you may have a claim against the State or whichever entity maintains the road you were driving on. I'm sure it varies by state but the state I worked for paid tort claims for road hazards--in some cases. Rugs and mattresses are extreme hazards, not to mention ladders! If it is on the police report, that should be a plus but the big if is the controlling law. Ask your insurance agent if there is an appeal process if they plan to increase rates. State insurance commissioners can provide info too.

I really appreciated your help smearcase. I honestly feel like I am a victim here, not a complete ignorant driver. I find it absurd how insurance companies only look at whether an object is stationary or flying in the air to consider whether you are at fault or not. There are a lot of stationary objects that could easily sit on the highway and even the most careful/safe driver would run over. Sorry, I just had to rant a little bit.

I am considering making a claim against the State. The accident happened in the state of California and I was just reading a about their policy. I did not file a police report, but a policeman was there on the scene. The reason why I did not say anything was because he told me it would be recorded with the DMV and it would enter and add points to my driving record. But, now that I think of it I was an idiot. I could have at least asked for his name and dept. If anyone has experienced a problem similar to mine, please tell me if I have any other options asides from taking the blame completely.

Insurance companies don't care who, what or why, if you have a wreck and it is the other persons fault, but they have no insurance and they have to pay, it still goes against you normally, they are only about profit and loss, what they pay out, and the risks of it happening again.

In fact you may even be lucky if they don't cancell you at the next renewal time

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ExarKun

I really appreciated your help smearcase. I honestly feel like I am a victim here, not a complete ignorant driver. I find it absurd how insurance companies only look at whether an object is stationary or flying in the air to consider whether you are at fault or not. There are a lot of stationary objects that could easily sit on the highway and even the most careful/safe driver would run over. Sorry, I just had to rant a little bit.

I am considering making a claim against the State. The accident happened in the state of California and I was just reading a bout thier policy. I did not file a police report, but a policeman was there on the scene. The reason why I did not say anything was because he told me it would be recorded with the DMV and it would enter and add points to my driving record. But, now that I think of it I was an idiot. I could have atleast asked for his name and dept. If anyone has experienced a problem similar to mine, please tell me if I have any other options asides from taking the blame completely.

---

What are your ground to sue the State of California?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fr_Chuck

insurance companies don't care who, what or why, if you have a wreck and it is the other persons fault, but they have no insurnace and they ahve to pay, it still goes against you normally, they are only about profit and loss, what they pay out, and the risks of it happening again.

In fact you may even be lucky if they don't cancell you at the next renewal time

---

Where I am - yes. There will either be a large rate hike or no renewal.

Wow, OK I would be surprised if they decide not to renew my policy. This is my first accident and I have a clean driving record, and I mean spotless. A large rate hike, I guess I can understand that it is extremely likely to happen. But, do they even take into account how the accident happened? Is there a difference between smashing into another car compare to my situation, running over a rug? Even if the costs of the damage are the same in either situation. I am sure there are statistics that show someone who smashes into a car is more likely to get into a 2nd accident then one who runs over a rug? Or vice versa. Are those statistics not taken into account?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ExarKun

Wow, OK i would be surprised if they decide not to renew my policy. This is my first accident and I have a clean driving record, and I mean spotless. A large rate hike, I guess I can understand that it is extremely likely to happen. But, do they even take into account how the accident happened? Is there a difference between smashing into another car compare to my situation, running over a rug? Even if the costs of the damage are the same in either situation. I am sure there are statistics that show someone who smashes into a car is more likely to get into a 2nd accident then one who runs over a rug? Or vice versa. Are those statistics not taken into account?

---

No, accidents are accidents. They don't sit down and determine the cause. They just count the number of accidents unless you're an established driver. Even then you can get cancelled.

What are your grounds for suing California?

How many people missed the rug before you hit it? That's what is going to be the question - ?

And, no, there are no statistics that show that someone who smashes into a car is more likely to get into a second accident than someone who runs over a rug.

You've got to be joking.

Something was in the road. You didn't see it. You hit it. Other people did not hit it.

That's what the insurance company will look at.

You say you have no violations except for a "few" parking tickets - if the insurance company takes a look at those they will probably decide you are irresponsible. Happens more frequently than people think.