Summons for Credit Card Debt (and I am so confused by these threads!)
I have been spending the last couple of hours reading threads regarding summons on credit card debt and I am beginning to feel like there are many schools of thought! I need help to get clarification.
Unfortunately, I received a summons this evening on a Discover credit card debt... no date, just a request to respond within 20 days. I had fallen behind on my payments about 10 months ago due to job and health. Every time I have called (or taken their calls), I have tried to work out payment arrangements. Each time, they have been unwilling... demanding that I pay in full or pay $900 per month, neither of which I can afford. (Heck, if I could afford to pay them $900 per month, I wouldn't be in this predicament!)
Here are my questions:
1. On many of the threads, it appears that the recommend is that you let the court know that you are going to dispute/defend. Is this merely to "buy" time?
2. Most also recommend requesting a validation/verification. Even if it is to the original creditor?
3. I have seen some threads talk about the idea that if there is no signature on the contract, there is no contract. Am I misunderstanding this?
4. Finally, all of this scares me a bit because if I do these things, won't I potentially be incurring more costs to their attorney?
I'm not saying this debt is not mine... it is mine. I have attempted to get Discover to work with me and they are unwilling, so now I am faced with this summons. There is no collection agency involved, as all of my communication has been directly through Discover. Which leads me to the last question:
5. Most people recommend throughout these threads that you should NOT skip out on the answer or court date. But how can I possibly "win"?? Won't a judgment be placed on me regardless if I am there or not?
Thank you, in advance, for your help!