Not on lease. Am I responsible for fees after ROOMMATE voluntarily breaks lease?
I live in CA. I have been living with my roommate for a year and a half and her name is the only one on the lease. We both moved into the place together after having just met, but she moved in 1 month early, paid the full deposit and was and still is the only name that has ever appeared on the lease. We had discussed me joining the lease once, but it wasn't a huge priority or necessity to either of us, so I never joined it. After living with her for a while, I learned that she pays the rent late, to the point of a 3 day eviction notice EVERY month, and the rental office knows this, so in the event of her asking me to join the lease, I would have noted that info as a major reason why I didn't want to join the lease. Regardless, I gave her a 30 day notice a few weeks ago that I am moving out. She did mention a few weeks before I gave my notice that she was signing another year lease and wanted to know if I planned on staying. I said for the most part yes, as long as nothing happens or comes up. Very vauge on both our parts. She is now saying that since I am leaving, she is moving out as well, thus breaking the new lease she just signed because in her own words "wont have another roommate" The fee for HER breaking HER lease because SHE doesn't want to find another roommate is 1200 (one months rent). She says I owe her half of that. Mind you, besides the obvois fact that MY NAME NEVER APPEARED ON THE LEASE, she could just as well find another roommate, finish the lease and avoid any and all fees.
My 1st question:
Does our vague discussion/'verbal agreement" hold up in court making me responsible for any fees or lease liability?
2: Even if a court grants that we had a verbal agreement, does it matter that she is choosing to move out, thus putting the whole burden of the fees on her?