Originally Posted by excon
Hello jerzeygirl:
You say he's facing 10 years to life. Ok. I'm not familiar with up to date federal sentencing guidelines. It's my understanding, however, that mandatory doesn't mean today what mandatory meant a few years ago. What I mean by that, it appears that the judge has more discretion in sentencing than at any time in the last 20 years. That's good for you and your hubby.
I hope that you've contacted us BEFORE he met the probation department to do the Pre-Sentence Investigation Report. That report is crucial, not only to his sentence, but to his custody level, and his eligibility for parole if they ever start doing that again.
He should view this interview as just another in which he should remain closemouthed. He should be polite. He should be contrite. He should take responsibility for his crimes. And, he should NOT admit to anything other than what he was convicted of.
He should also have an opportunity to view the report before its submitted, and he should challenge it if there is ANY discrepancy or allegations NOT proven in court. As an example, even though he may have been convicted in a conspiracy for 5 k's, some of his co-defendants may have alluded to much larger amounts. Sometimes those allegations of larger amounts wind up in the PSI Report and everybody, including the judge, who subsequently reads the report, treats him as though the larger amounts were fact.
Once those things are in the report, they are impossible to get out. His ONLY chance is in the beginning.
What he is sentenced to, how long he serves, the quality of his time, and where he serves it is very much in your hands.
excon