Originally Posted by margog85
The definition of 'normal' is, at least in my perspective, more of a sociological question than a philosophical one. The 'norm' is what is most widely accepted by society in the time and place you are referring to. The typical use of the word 'normal' has been adapted and integrated into modern language as something different than it's sociological basis, however, and is now used to basically mean whatever the individual perceives as the 'right' way to be. However, as this is still impacted by the social atmosphere the individual is in, the real philosophical question might be more along the lines of... why do people, who exist within the same society and social groups, develop differing perspectives of what is 'normal' (aka right and acceptable according to the most frequent usage of the term)? Because what 'normal' is can be pretty easily defined. Why people develop the ideas they do about what is or is not 'normal' is, to me, a more intriuging question.