Is a falsified document enough to get a defult judgement thrown out?
My wages are being garnished. When I went to the courthouse to file an objection to the garnishment, I was told that I didn't have grounds to do that, and that I would have a hard time contesting the judgement because all the paperwork in my file was in line. I got copies of the paperwork I had never received, including the notice of default judgement, and proof of service for a summons to appear. The jurdgement was entered in May, the summons expired in June, I didn't receive it until July. However, according to the proof of service document, the process server certified that he personally delivered the summons to me at home in March. Under the "Acknowledgement of service" section, there is an inaccurate physical decription of me and a note that I declined to sign. The most interesting part of this document is the date and time at which the process server claims to have personally served me at my home. On that date at that time, I was at work 15 miles away, and I can prove it. Is this enough for me to object to the garnishment because "the garnishment was not properly issued or otherwise invalid?" Would the garnishment be invalid if the suit was invalid if the process server lied?