Originally Posted by ScottGem
As Synnen pointed out there are different sex crimes and levels of sex offender. Sex offenders are rated as to the probability of their repeating their crimes. Look at that kid (Wilson?) that got convicted for having consensual oral sex with a 15 yr old when he was 17. If this kid to be considered a danger to other children? When he finally (hopefully soon) gets out of jail and has a family, should he be barred from attending his kids school functions?
While I support sex offender registries, I think they have to be used more judiciously. I don't think it can be assumed that someone who made one mistake or even a certain type of mistake, would continue to be a danger.