Hi everyone! Hope everyone is doing OK.

Most of you remember me posting my case here where I was being taken to court because according to them I owed some account by citybank.


Well I went to the hearing it was with a magistrate not with judge, however, the plaintiff was on the phone (due to distance) and I was present at the court. I told them about not receiving any evidence and rule of discovery, The magistrate advised the plaintiff that I was a head and the plaintiff said to give her till September to get all the avidence, however, I told the magistrate that she was given only 30 days to present evidence which she failed to do. About 5 days later, I received a stipulation of dismissal...


Could I counter sue? Or should I just sign these papers so that the case be dismissed. You answer is much appreciated.

Just sign the papers. You really have no grounds for a counter suit. If you try you just give the plaintiff more time to get the documentation together.

Let it ride angel you won your case!

Just one note, at least here, a magistrate is a judge ( not sure about your area but here they are)

Sign it get it over with and move on

Thanks for all of you help and answers. Bless all...